Skip to main content

Security report for lienedremane.lv

Dr. Lienes Drēmanes ģimenes ārsta prakse · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'lienedremane.lv' represents a small healthcare provider specializing in family doctor services in Latvia. It offers key services such as family doctor consultations, home visits, and medical advice via phone, targeting local residents seeking primary healthcare. The site is professionally designed using the Hugo static site generator, with modern fonts and icons, and is mobile optimized for a good user experience. However, no privacy or cookie policies are present, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly impacts trust and compliance assessment. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lienedremane.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lienedremane.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lienedremane.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a local family doctor practice in Latvia, focusing on essential healthcare services. Its market position is that of a trusted local healthcare provider with direct phone contact for consultations and emergency advice. The business model is service-based, relying on patient visits and telephonic medical advice. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content and structure support a straightforward healthcare service offering with no e-commerce or complex business operations. Growth potential may be limited to local community reach. The presence of government-related external links suggests alignment with national health services.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for healthcare-related sites, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no security certifications are displayed. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR requirements. The WHOIS data is not accessible, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used, implying user tracking without visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet healthcare data protection standards fully.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to enhance domain trustworthiness.
  5. Review and disclose data retention policies related to analytics and user data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dr. Lienes Drēmanes ģimenes ārsta prakse
Description
Dr. Lienes Drēmanes ģimenes ārsta prakse offering family doctor services including home visits, medical advice, and emergency contact information.
Key services
Family doctor consultations, Home visits, Medical advice via phone, Information on emergency medical services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, JavaScript
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL scheme (https://)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to phone numbers; no emails or physical addresses found.
  5. No forms detected on the website.
  6. Website uses Hugo static site generator and modern web fonts and icons.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts present indicating user tracking.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL usage assumed from HTTPS URL.
  9. Content is healthcare focused, safe, and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, which provides fast performance and good mobile optimization. It uses modern web fonts (Google Fonts) and FontAwesome icons. The site loads quickly and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking. There is no evidence of server-side scripting or dynamic content. The site lacks security headers and formal privacy mechanisms, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and efficient but could benefit from improved security and privacy technical controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lienedremane.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lienedremane.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.