Skip to main content

Security report for lido.lv

LIDO · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LIDO is a Latvian hospitality business focused on providing fresh, authentic, and quality food with a democratic approach to choice, price, and taste nuances. The website targets Latvian-speaking consumers and positions itself as a trusted local brand in the food service industry. The digital infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The website is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communication. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages were not detected in the provided content, which may impact compliance and user trust. The security posture is generally good with HTTPS and consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and detailed contact information for incident response. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lido.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lido.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
23
Employees
0
Customers
18
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
4%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lido.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LIDO operates in the hospitality sector in Latvia, offering restaurant and food delivery services. The business model centers on quality food with a focus on freshness and authenticity, appealing to local consumers. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality. Marketing and tracking tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager indicate active digital marketing efforts. The absence of detailed business registration or contact information on the website limits deeper business intelligence insights. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the content. The company appears to maintain a solid market position locally with a focus on customer experience and brand trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a fundamental security requirement. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing users control over preferences, statistics, and marketing cookies, indicating GDPR awareness. The use of reCAPTCHA helps mitigate bot traffic. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good encryption and consent management but could benefit from enhanced headers and clearer security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking technologies to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LIDO
Description
Mūsu pamatvērtība ir demokrātija it visā - izvēlē, cenā, uzturvērtībā un garšu niansēs. Vienīgais, par ko esam nelokāmi, ir svaigs, īsts un dabīgs, kvalitatīvs ēdiens.
Key services
Food service, Restaurant dining, Delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Use of modern tracking and marketing technologies including Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Website content is in Latvian language targeting local audience.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) found in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph metadata for social sharing. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks structured data (JSON-LD) which could improve SEO and rich results. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with additional SEO and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lido.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lido.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.