Skip to main content

Security report for licensetrak.com

Bluesight · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bluesight is a well-established healthcare technology company specializing in hospital and pharmacy operations solutions. Founded in 2004, it offers a suite of products including RFID inventory management, diversion surveillance, purchasing optimization, 340B compliance, drug shortage management, and patient privacy monitoring. The company holds a strong market position with recognized awards and a clear focus on simplifying workflows and data integration for health systems. Their target audience primarily includes hospitals and pharmacy operations teams. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel. The site is hosted on AWS infrastructure and demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses domain locks to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, and employs multiple security best practices, though it could improve by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, reflecting a mature digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching licensetrak.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bluesight operates in the healthcare technology sector, focusing on hospital pharmacy operations. Its business model is B2B SaaS and technology solutions, targeting health systems and hospitals. The company differentiates itself through innovation, integration of fragmented data, and automation of workflows. It has a portfolio of award-winning products and a strong customer base including major healthcare providers. The presence of multiple product-specific login portals and partnerships (e.g., RXAuditor) indicates a broad ecosystem. The company’s longevity and domain age support its credibility. Marketing and analytics tools are leveraged effectively to engage and convert prospects. The company maintains clear contact channels and trust signals such as customer logos and success stories.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status locks preventing unauthorized changes. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement for DNS security. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which could improve transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and additional DNS protections.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and enhance domain security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Add additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the web application.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bluesight
Description
Hospital intelligence technology to simplify hospital and pharmacy operations, finances, and compliance.
Key services
RFID Inventory Management, Diversion Surveillance, Purchasing Optimization, 340B Compliance, Drug Shortage Management, Patient Privacy Monitoring
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Bootstrap, jQuery, Lottie animations, HubSpot analytics and marketing scripts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, AdRoll, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Freshchat
Frameworks
Bootstrap, WMX Framework (custom WordPress theme)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked against deletion and transfer
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status flags in WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot Analytics, Freshchat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare technology provider focused on hospital and pharmacy operations.
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging throughout site.
  3. Multiple product offerings with clear descriptions and customer success stories.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  6. Security posture is good but could improve with DNSSEC and published security policies.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS with a custom WMX Framework child theme, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates advanced features such as Lottie animations for enhanced user experience. The site uses multiple analytics and marketing tools including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and AdRoll, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting is provided via AWS DNS services, suggesting reliable and scalable infrastructure. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich search results. The technical implementation reflects a modern, professional, and well-maintained website with opportunities for further security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with licensetrak.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review licensetrak.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.