Skip to main content

Security report for libsyn.com

Liberated Syndication (Libsyn) · Media · N/A

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Libsyn is a leading podcast hosting and monetization platform serving a wide range of podcasters from independent creators to large enterprises. The company offers comprehensive podcast hosting, distribution, analytics, and monetization services including advertising marketplaces and subscription models. Their market position is strong with a well-established brand and a broad service portfolio tailored to diverse podcasting needs. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, optimized for SEO and user experience, and supported by Cloudflare CDN for performance and security. Security posture is solid with a valid SSL certificate and no known vulnerabilities, though improvements such as enabling HSTS and DNSSEC could enhance security further. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Libsyn demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business and technical foundations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of libsyn.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching libsyn.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Libsyn operates in the media sector focusing on podcast hosting and monetization. Their business model is subscription-based with additional revenue from advertising and enterprise solutions. The company targets independent podcasters, brands, networks, and enterprises, offering scalable solutions from basic hosting to private podcast apps. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive feature set, strong analytics, and monetization options. Partnerships with payment processors and advertising platforms enhance their ecosystem. The company maintains a consistent brand and high-quality content, supported by active social media channels and marketing tools. Growth indicators include enterprise offerings and a robust support and educational resource base.

Security posture

Libsyn's security maturity is moderate to good. The site uses a valid SSL certificate issued by a reputable CA and is protected by Cloudflare CDN, which provides DDoS mitigation and caching. No vulnerable SSL protocols or known SSL vulnerabilities are present. However, the absence of HSTS and DNSSEC reduces protection against certain attack vectors. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and no security.txt file is found, which limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, suggesting room for improvement in security communication and governance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS queries from spoofing and cache poisoning.
  3. Add Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS records to restrict which CAs can issue certificates for the domain.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure policy and contact information for security researchers.
  5. Develop and publicly share an incident response policy and dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and multiple plugins for SEO, analytics, and user experience enhancements. It uses Cloudflare as a CDN and proxy, improving performance and security. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and OneTrust for cookie consent. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is excellent with Yoast SEO and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and HSTS, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. The site shows no signs of technical debt and uses up-to-date libraries and plugins, indicating good maintenance and modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100 −3Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 69/100 +3Medium31 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with libsyn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review libsyn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.