Skip to main content

Security report for libramemoria.com

Media · France

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Libra Memoria is a French media platform specializing in the aggregation and publication of obituary notices from various regional newspapers and funeral homes. It offers users the ability to search for death notices, subscribe to alerts, and access related funeral services such as flower delivery and funeral home directories. The platform targets French-speaking individuals seeking to honor and remember deceased loved ones. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and social media, and uses a GDPR-compliant consent management platform (Didomi). While the site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages and does not expose contact information clearly. Security-wise, HTTPS is implied but no security headers were detected in the provided data, and no WHOIS information is available for the domain, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching libramemoria.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche media sector focused on obituary notices in France, leveraging partnerships such as with Interflora for flower delivery. Its revenue model likely includes subscription fees for death alerts and advertising. The platform serves a specialized audience interested in death notices and funeral information, positioning itself as a comprehensive resource in this domain. The lack of WHOIS data and limited public business information suggests either a new or privacy-protected domain registration. The company maintains a moderate digital presence with integration of common marketing and analytics tools but lacks visible certifications or detailed corporate disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and GDPR consent management. However, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy policies reduces its compliance and security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of incident response contacts and security policies indicates room for improvement in security governance. The missing WHOIS data is a risk factor for domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site is reasonably secure but should enhance transparency and implement additional security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Libra Memoria est le site des avis de décès de l’Alsace, du Bien Public, du Dauphiné Libéré, des Dernières Nouvelles d’Alsace, de diverses autres publications. Le site agrège les avis de décès publiés dans la presse et transmis par les pompes funèbres, offrant un service de recherche et hommage en ligne.
Key services
Consultation of obituary notices, Publication of obituary notices, Subscription to death alerts, Funeral services directory, Sending flowers via partners
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery UI, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent SDK, Privacy Center SDK, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL and Google Tag Manager)
  • Consent management for GDPR compliance
  • Cookie consent and tracking control

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick (implied by DFP ad div ids)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK), Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Didomi Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French about obituary notices.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which reduces trust in domain legitimacy.
  3. Good use of consent management and tracking controls for GDPR compliance.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or header.
  5. Multiple external scripts loaded from reputable domains.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  7. No privacy policy or terms of service pages clearly linked or detected.
  8. Website uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and social integration.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries like jQuery UI and integrates third-party SDKs for Facebook and privacy consent management. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical setup supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer business information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with libramemoria.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review libramemoria.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.