Skip to main content

Security report for lianmengpaipai.com

联盟排排网 · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

联盟排排网 is a Chinese advertising alliance review and recommendation website targeting webmasters and site owners. It provides detailed evaluations, rankings, and user comments on various advertising alliances, helping users select trustworthy and effective advertising partners. The site offers free publishing of information and maintains a database of advertising alliances with user feedback and rankings. Technically, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and an outdated version of jQuery (1.3), with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Hosting is provided by Cloud Yuqu LLC, but WHOIS data shows inconsistencies such as a future domain creation date and lack of DNSSEC, raising legitimacy concerns. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and modern best practices. Privacy compliance is poor, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lianmengpaipai.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector, specifically focusing on advertising alliance evaluations and webmaster resources. It targets Chinese-speaking webmasters seeking reliable advertising partners. The business model revolves around providing free listings, user reviews, and rankings of advertising alliances, potentially monetized through advertising and partnerships. The site has been active since 2010, indicating longevity in its niche. External partnerships include domain registration and hosting providers, as well as major advertising platforms like Google Ads and Baidu. However, some suspicious external domains and user comments suggest the need for vigilance regarding content authenticity. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive alliance database and user-generated feedback, although trust could be enhanced with better transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate but shows several gaps. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory, but no DNSSEC is configured for the domain, and no security headers such as Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The WHOIS data inconsistency (future domain creation date) raises questions about domain legitimacy. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content, the site would benefit from modern security enhancements and privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  5. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
联盟排排网
Description
广告联盟评测网，专业的(广告联盟)评测网站，为站长提供联盟曝光与信誉联盟推荐平台
Key services
广告联盟评测, 联盟曝光, 联盟推荐, 站长资讯, 免费发布信息
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery 1.3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
aizhantj.com
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
腾讯QQ广告联盟, 极点广告联盟, 九维广告联盟, 114效果营销联盟
Tracking pixels
aizhantj.com
Marketing tools
百度推广, 谷歌推广
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Chinese advertising alliance review and recommendation platform targeting webmasters.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese with no privacy or cookie policies found.
  3. Site uses outdated jQuery version 1.3 and lacks modern security headers.
  4. WHOIS data shows domain creation date in the future, which is suspicious.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  6. Multiple external links to advertising and hosting services.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  8. User comments and rankings provide some trust signals but some comments indicate possible fake reviews.
  9. No GDPR or privacy compliance indicators present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using classic HTML and CSS with JavaScript enhancements via jQuery 1.3, which is outdated and may pose security risks. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile devices beyond basic layout. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description but no Open Graph or structured data found. External scripts include tracking from a third-party analytics provider (aizhantj.com). Hosting is through Cloud Yuqu LLC with custom name servers. The site could improve by adopting modern responsive design, upgrading libraries, and enhancing SEO with structured data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lianmengpaipai.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lianmengpaipai.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.