Skip to main content

Security report for lianlianpay.com

连网（杭州）信息技术有限公司 · Finance · China

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LianLianPay (连连支付) operates as a Chinese financial technology company specializing in domestic and cross-border payment services. The website presents a business-focused platform offering network payment, account services, and aggregation services targeting enterprises and cross-border e-commerce clients. The company is positioned as a leading payment service provider in China with compliance indicators such as ICP and public security filings. Technically, the website is built using Nuxt.js and JavaScript with basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and no explicit contact or security incident information is provided. Security posture is limited with no detected security headers or HTTPS verification in the provided data, indicating room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and reduces overall trust. Overall, the website is functional but basic in content and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lianlianpay.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the finance sector, specifically payment processing for domestic and international markets. Its business model revolves around providing payment gateway services, account management, and aggregation solutions for enterprises and e-commerce platforms. The presence of official Chinese regulatory filings suggests legitimate operations within China. However, the lack of detailed business information such as founding year, parent company, or subsidiaries limits deeper business intelligence. The website's minimal content and absence of contact details may impact customer trust and engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or affiliate programs from the website content. The company appears to focus on a B2B model with a large-scale operation given the sector and service scope.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low to moderate. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details were found in the provided data, and no security headers were detected, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which may hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The website does not expose any obvious vulnerabilities or sensitive data in the analyzed content, but the lack of security best practices and transparency reduces overall security confidence. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
连网（杭州）信息技术有限公司
Description
连连支付（LianLianPay）提供国内及跨境支付服务，致力于连接全球市场，服务全球客户。
Key services
网络收付服务, 账户服务, 聚合服务, 跨境支付
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Nuxt.js, CSS, Alibaba Icon Font
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. Website content is minimal but business-focused on payment services.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Website uses Nuxt.js framework and Alibaba icon fonts.
  9. ICP and public security filings indicate Chinese jurisdiction compliance.
  10. No explicit security or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework Nuxt.js, indicating a server-side rendered Vue.js application. The use of Alibaba icon fonts suggests integration with Chinese web resources. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts and stylesheets, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks analytics and tracking scripts, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. The absence of security headers and unclear SSL status are technical risks. The site structure is simple with minimal content and no advanced SEO or accessibility features detected. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100 +3Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lianlianpay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lianlianpay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.