Skip to main content

Security report for lhouse.eu

LHouse.eu · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LHouse.eu operates as a Lighting as a Service (LaaS) provider, focusing on delivering energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable lighting solutions. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking to reduce energy consumption and costs through innovative lighting services. Positioned in the energy sector, LHouse.eu emphasizes sustainability and cost savings as key value propositions. The website reflects a professional business model with clear service offerings centered on LaaS. Technically, the website is built on the WordPress platform, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Contact Form 7 for user inquiries, and Slider Revolution for enhanced visual presentation. The site employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented, contributing to a positive user experience and discoverability. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices including HTTPS enforcement and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. A cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the absence of published privacy policies, terms of service, security policies, and incident response information represents gaps in compliance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, LHouse.eu presents a credible and professional online presence with a solid technical foundation. To enhance trust and compliance, the company should publish comprehensive privacy and security policies and provide clear incident response contacts. These steps will strengthen the security posture and regulatory adherence, supporting sustainable business growth.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lhouse.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lhouse.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lhouse.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LHouse.eu is positioned as a niche service provider in the energy sector, specializing in Lighting as a Service (LaaS). This business model leverages recurring service contracts rather than one-time product sales, targeting organizations aiming to improve energy efficiency and sustainability. The company’s market positioning highlights environmental benefits and cost savings, appealing to eco-conscious and budget-sensitive clients. The presence of social media channels on LinkedIn and Facebook supports brand visibility and customer engagement. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with focused service offerings. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA protecting user input forms. The cookie consent banner aligns with GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, security policies, and incident response contacts indicates incomplete compliance and preparedness. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. The security posture would benefit from formalizing policies, publishing a security.txt file, and implementing additional HTTP security headers. These improvements would reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels for security issues.
  4. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LHouse.eu
Description
Lighting as a Service (LaaS) solutions offering energy efficiency, environmental sustainability, and significant cost savings.
Key services
Lighting as a Service (LaaS), Energy efficiency solutions, Environmental sustainability consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form and social media links.
  5. Website built on WordPress with common plugins for SEO and forms.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  9. Website content is professional and focused on energy efficiency lighting services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with widely used plugins for SEO, forms, and sliders, indicating a standard but effective technical infrastructure. The use of HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA enhances security. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO benefits and social media integration. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to further modernize the technical stack and reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lhouse.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lhouse.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.