Skip to main content

Security report for lgt.li

LGT Private Banking · Finance · Liechtenstein

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LGT Private Banking is a well-established global private bank with over 100 years of history, specializing in wealth management and investment solutions for wealthy clients. The company emphasizes sustainability and forward-looking investment strategies, serving ultra-high-net-worth individuals and financial intermediaries worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multiple language and location options, comprehensive content including news, insights, and career opportunities, and secure client login portals. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Piwik PRO analytics, and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie handling, though explicit security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lgt.li

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lgt.li, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lgt.li right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LGT occupies a strong market position as a family-owned private bank with a global footprint, focusing on sustainable investment and personalized client services. Its business model centers on private banking, investment solutions, and ultra-high-net-worth individual services, supported by digital platforms for clients and intermediaries. The company maintains a consistent brand image and communicates trust signals through awards, longevity, and transparent policies. Partnerships such as LGT Venture Philanthropy enhance its impact and market reach. The website content and structure support client engagement and business growth, with clear navigation and relevant financial insights.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure login portals, and cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. There is no public security policy or vulnerability disclosure page, which could improve transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the security measures align with industry best practices for financial institutions, supporting client trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and make publicly available a security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance data retention policy disclosures to inform users about how long their data is stored and managed.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LGT Private Banking
Description
For more than 100 years, LGT has been the global private bank for wealthy clients who want to invest in a forward looking and sustainable manner.
Key services
Private banking, Investment solutions, UHNWI services, Digital banking platforms (LGT SmartBanking and SmartBanking Pro)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Piwik PRO analytics, Select2 (dropdown UI), Slick carousel, Schema.org JSON-LD structured data
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login portals with external URLs
  • Use of nonce attributes in inline scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Piwik PRO Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on sustainability and long-term investment
  3. Multiple language and location options available
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  5. Active social media presence with LinkedIn and Facebook links
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with privacy considerations
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  8. Secure login portals for clients and intermediaries
  9. Regularly updated news and insights content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including JavaScript, Piwik PRO analytics, and UI libraries like Select2 and Slick carousel. It uses JSON-LD structured data for SEO and semantic clarity. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and asynchronous script loading. The CMS or platform is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with opportunities to enhance security headers and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lgt.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lgt.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.