Skip to main content

Security report for lg.lv

AS Latvijas Gāze · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS Latvijas Gāze is a leading energy company specializing in natural gas supply for residential and business customers primarily in Latvia, with operations extending to Lithuania, Estonia, and Finland. The company positions itself as a stable and responsible energy partner, emphasizing sustainability and customer service. Their website offers comprehensive information on products, contracts, meter readings, tariffs, and customer portals, reflecting a mature business model focused on energy distribution and customer engagement. The presence of ISO certifications and an EcoVadis Gold Medal further underscores their commitment to quality and sustainability. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Vue.js, Genesys customer engagement widgets, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, features clear navigation, and integrates multiple languages and country-specific portals. Performance is moderate with good accessibility and SEO practices in place. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements robust security headers, and uses third-party monitoring tools like Sentry. Cookie consent is actively managed with blocking modes to ensure compliance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, representing an area for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance, supporting the company's credibility and trustworthiness in the energy sector. Strategic recommendations include publishing dedicated security and incident response policies, enhancing transparency around vulnerability disclosures, and continuing to monitor third-party integrations for security risks.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of lg.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lg.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AS Latvijas Gāze operates as a key player in the Baltic energy market, providing natural gas solutions to residential and commercial customers. Their business model revolves around energy supply, contract management, and customer self-service portals. The company leverages partnerships with distribution operators like GASO and maintains subsidiaries for contract and customer portal management. Their market position is reinforced by certifications and sustainability awards, indicating a competitive advantage in corporate responsibility. The website content targets end-users, businesses, and investors, reflecting a diversified audience. The company shows growth and digital maturity through multi-country presence and advanced customer engagement tools.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and use of consent management tools to comply with GDPR. Integration of Sentry for error and behavior monitoring indicates proactive security monitoring. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities were found in the visible content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, with clear categorization of cookies and user control. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced public documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS Latvijas Gāze
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS Latvijas Gāze
Description
Dabasgāze apkurei un ēdiena gatavošanai. Informācija par maksājumu veikšanu, skaitītāja rādījumu nodošanu, tarifiem, cenām un citiem ar gāzi saistītiem jautājumiem.
Key services
natural gas supply, customer portal, contract management, meter reading submission, tariff calculators
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Genesys Widgets, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Sentry
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Secure forms with consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel, Sentry Replay
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Multiple language options and country-specific portals are available.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and third-party integrations.
  5. Clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  8. Presence of ISO certifications and EcoVadis Gold Medal indicates strong corporate responsibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) with integration of customer engagement tools (Genesys), consent management (Cookiebot), and analytics (Google Tag Manager, Sentry). The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple languages and country-specific portals, indicating a scalable and flexible infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times. The use of security headers and HTTPS is exemplary. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack supports a professional and secure user experience but should continue evolving to maintain performance and security standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lg.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lg.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.