Skip to main content

Security report for lfkvs.de

LFK Partner Bußhardt Huber Partnerschaft mbB Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberater . Rechtsanwälte · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LFK PARTNER is a professional partnership based in Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany, offering auditing, tax consulting, legal, and business consulting services. The company targets businesses and professionals requiring comprehensive financial and legal advisory services. The website reflects a regional professional services provider with a solid market position in finance and legal sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations and employs a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, appropriate security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lfkvs.de

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lfkvs.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lfkvs.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance, tax, and legal consulting sectors, serving a medium-sized market segment primarily in Germany. Its business model is a professional partnership offering specialized services in auditing, tax, legal advice, and business consulting. The website integrates partner content from Wiadok Steuernews, indicating a partnership ecosystem for content and service enhancement. The presence of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, along with professional contact information, supports credibility and regulatory compliance. The company appears focused on maintaining a professional image and compliance with GDPR, which is critical in its industry. Growth indicators include multilingual support and digital marketing tools integration.

Security posture

LFK PARTNER demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and GDPR-compliant, documenting user consent effectively. No security policy or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The use of third-party scripts is limited and controlled, reducing attack surface. Recommendations include publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and handling of security incidents.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LFK Partner Bußhardt Huber Partnerschaft mbB Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberater . Rechtsanwälte
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LFK Partner Bußhardt Huber Partnerschaft mbB Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberater . Rechtsanwälte
Description
LFK PARTNER is a professional partnership offering auditing, tax consulting, legal advice, and business consulting services based in Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Key services
Wirtschaftsprüfung (Auditing), Steuerberatung (Tax consulting), Rechtsanwälte (Legal services), Unternehmensberatung (Business consulting)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Real Cookie Banner plugin, Animate.css, PHP, JavaScript
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with documented GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Real Cookie Banner
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with GDPR compliance.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with professional business details.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  7. Good SEO and mobile optimization observed.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations and the Real Cookie Banner plugin for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided via namespace4you.de, as indicated by the nameservers. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices, with proper meta tags and structured data for privacy and cookie policies. Performance is moderate, with preloading of critical scripts and styles. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and implement advanced security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lfkvs.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lfkvs.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.