Skip to main content

Security report for lesilesdeguadeloupe.com

Comité Tourisme des Iles de Guadeloupe · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.lesilesdeguadeloupe.com serves as the official tourism portal for the Guadeloupe islands, operated by the Comité Tourisme des Iles de Guadeloupe. It provides comprehensive information on activities, beaches, accommodations, cultural events, and travel planning resources targeted at tourists and visitors. The site is multilingual, supporting French, English, and German, and is well-structured with rich media and SEO optimizations. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, offering good mobile responsiveness and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or terms policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for tourism purposes but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lesilesdeguadeloupe.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lesilesdeguadeloupe.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lesilesdeguadeloupe.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Comité Tourisme des Iles de Guadeloupe positions itself as the authoritative source for tourism in Guadeloupe, leveraging a content-rich website to attract and inform visitors. Its business model focuses on promoting local tourism services, events, and accommodations, likely funded by governmental or regional tourism bodies. The site’s multilingual support and detailed guides indicate a strategy to capture international tourists. The presence of social media integration and analytics tools suggests active marketing and audience engagement efforts. The lack of visible direct contact information or business registration details on the site may limit direct commercial interactions but aligns with a promotional and informational role rather than direct sales.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent via Axeptio, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for an informational tourism site but with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Comité Tourisme des Iles de Guadeloupe
Description
Tourisme en Guadeloupe : activités, plages; hébergements, circuits & guides. Planifiez et réservez votre séjour sur le site officiel du CTIG !
Key services
Tourism information, Activity guides, Accommodation listings, Event agenda, Travel planning
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, MapLibre, Axeptio (cookie consent), Polylang (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Multilingual support with French, English, and German
  3. Strong SEO and structured data usage
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  5. Cookie consent implemented via Axeptio
  6. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages linked
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  9. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and MapLibre for mapping features. It uses the Polylang plugin for multilingual support and Axeptio for cookie consent management. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets efficiently and is optimized for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The technical implementation is robust for a tourism portal but could benefit from additional security hardening and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lesilesdeguadeloupe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lesilesdeguadeloupe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.