Skip to main content

Security report for lesarcs-peiseyvallandry.com

Hospitality · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.lesarcs-peiseyvallandry.com serves as the official platform for purchasing ski passes, pedestrian passes, funicular tickets, and altitude experiences in the Les Arcs Peisey Vallandry mountain area, part of the Paradiski ski region. It targets tourists and skiers visiting this region, offering e-commerce services for access to mountain facilities. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as React and integrates tracking and consent management tools like Google Tag Manager and Privacy Center SDK. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lesarcs-peiseyvallandry.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on mountain tourism and ski-related services. Its market position is that of an official regional website, likely trusted by visitors for authentic ticketing services. The business model is primarily e-commerce, selling access passes online. There is no visible information about company size, founding year, or parent company. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance. The integration of tracking tools indicates a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is presumably enabled (favicon and scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent banner, or terms of service, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, clear privacy documentation, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure WHOIS domain registration data is complete and publicly available to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user support.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response policy and security contact channels to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Official website for ski passes, pedestrian passes, funicular, and altitude experiences in Les Arcs Peisey Vallandry mountain area, part of Paradiski.
Key services
Ski Pass sales, Pedestrian Pass sales, Funicular access, Altitude experience tickets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Material Icons, Toastify (for notifications), Privacy Center SDK, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Privacy Center SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the content
  5. Uses modern frontend technologies including React and Toastify
  6. Includes Google Tag Manager and Privacy Center SDK for tracking and consent management
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No visible security or incident response policies
  9. Content is focused on ski passes and mountain tourism services
  10. No adult or explicit content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily React, with UI components styled using Material Icons and Toastify for notifications. It integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and Privacy Center SDK for consent management. The site appears mobile-optimized and has a professional design. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider from the data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in SEO and accessibility features. The lack of security headers and privacy documentation indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lesarcs-peiseyvallandry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lesarcs-peiseyvallandry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.