Skip to main content

Security report for lerika.cz

LERIKA Tax & Accounting, s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LERIKA Tax & Accounting, s.r.o. is a small professional services firm based in Prague, Czech Republic, specializing in tax consulting, accounting, payroll management, and related economic advisory services. The company targets businesses primarily in the Czech and Slovak markets, offering a broad range of financial and administrative services including company liquidation, real estate valuation, and investment support. The website is built on WordPress and uses several common plugins and libraries, but it runs outdated versions which pose security risks. The site is accessible, uses HTTPS, and includes Google Analytics with privacy-conscious settings. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and security headers are missing, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lerika.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LERIKA operates in the finance sector with a focus on accounting and tax advisory services. Its business model is service-oriented, providing outsourced financial and administrative support to companies. The firm appears to be a small-sized entity with a regional market focus. The website's content and navigation are basic but functional, with moderate branding consistency. The company maintains active social media profiles on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, enhancing its market presence. The lack of detailed WHOIS data is due to EURid privacy policies, but the website's contact details and domain TLD align with its claimed Czech Republic location. No suspicious patterns were detected, supporting legitimacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization, reflecting some privacy awareness. However, the WordPress core and jQuery library versions are outdated, exposing the site to known vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, reducing defense-in-depth. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The contact form collects personal data but lacks visible security or privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires updates and policy additions to improve compliance and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security HTTP headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and remove unused or outdated plugins and scripts to reduce attack surface.
  5. Enhance user trust by adding visible trust indicators such as certifications or client testimonials.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LERIKA Tax & Accounting, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LERIKA Tax & Accounting, s.r.o.
Description
LERIKA provides comprehensive tax consulting, accounting services, payroll management, and other economic services including company liquidation, real estate valuation, investment support, and company establishment.
Key services
Tax consulting, Accounting services, Payroll management, Company liquidation, Real estate valuation, Investment support, Company establishment
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.1.42, jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, WPML Multilingual CMS, Cyclone Slider 2, Font Awesome, Foundation Icons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Twitter widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based professional services site for accounting and tax consulting.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy restrictions.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and contact form.
  5. Site uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, posing security risks.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. Google Analytics is implemented with IP anonymization and limited ad personalization.
  8. No WAF or security blocking detected; site is accessible.
  9. Site content is in Czech language targeting Czech and Slovak businesses.
  10. 404 error page content was provided, indicating the requested URL was not found but site is functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.1.42, which is significantly outdated and may expose the site to security risks. It uses jQuery 1.11.1 and several plugins including Contact Form 7, WPML for multilingual support, and Cyclone Slider 2. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts and Font Awesome. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and structured navigation but lacks advanced SEO enhancements. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lerika.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lerika.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.