Skip to main content

Security report for lekkerland.de

Lekkerland SE · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lekkerland SE is a leading convenience wholesaler and logistics provider in Germany, serving approximately 40,000 retail points with a broad product assortment and tailored services. The company is part of the REWE Group, a major European retail conglomerate. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive business information, structured data, and multi-language support. However, the technical infrastructure shows critical security weaknesses, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which exposes users to risks and undermines trust. Privacy compliance is well managed with cookie consent via Usercentrics and a comprehensive privacy policy. The site uses modern marketing and analytics tools but suffers from slow load times and lacks advanced security headers. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment and security hardening are essential to elevate the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lekkerland.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lekkerland operates in the retail and logistics sectors, focusing on convenience products for on-the-go consumption. Its business model centers on wholesale distribution combined with logistics and consulting services. The company benefits from its affiliation with the REWE Group, enhancing market reach and credibility. The website targets retailers such as gas stations, kiosks, and foodservice providers, offering product catalogs, training, and optimization services. The presence of multiple social media channels and a career subdomain indicates a well-rounded digital ecosystem. The company emphasizes quality, innovation, and customer support, positioning itself as a market leader in convenience retail logistics.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and no HTTP security headers are present. While SPF and DMARC records are properly configured, indicating good email security practices, the web security configuration is insufficient. The site uses third-party scripts and cookie consent management responsibly but must urgently address transport layer security to protect user data and maintain compliance with industry standards. No incident response or security policy pages were found, suggesting limited transparency in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions to improve encryption strength.
  3. Implement essential HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS usage.
  5. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  6. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.
  7. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  8. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lekkerland SE
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard but robust content management setup. It uses React partially and integrates Usercentrics for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. The site has a large page size and many resources, resulting in slow load times. Accessibility and SEO are implemented at a basic to good level. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical debt. The site uses several external domains for fonts, scripts, and social media integration, which are well managed. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lekkerland.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lekkerland.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.