Asociace inovativního farmaceutického průmyslu (AIFP) · Healthcare · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.
The website lekarskekongresy.cz serves as a transparency platform managed by the Asociace inovativního farmaceutického průmyslu (AIFP), a Czech pharmaceutical industry association. It focuses on providing a database related to Continuing Medical Education (CME) disclosures, promoting transparency in financial support between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare professionals. The site targets medical professionals, pharmaceutical companies, and event organizers, positioning itself as a trusted resource within the Czech healthcare sector. The business model is non-commercial, emphasizing transparency and ethical collaboration in the pharmaceutical industry. The website content is professionally presented, consistent with the association's branding and mission. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Swiper.js for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking and CookieHub for cookie consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and provides a clear navigation structure. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with Czech providers, supporting the site's legitimacy. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with no dedicated privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a notable gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with formalized policies and enhanced header configurations. The overall risk assessment is low, with the site appearing trustworthy and professionally maintained. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and improving transparency around incident response and vulnerability disclosures to strengthen compliance and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
DMARC provides email authentication and reporting
What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention lekarskekongresy.cz, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for lekarskekongresy.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with lekarskekongresy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lekarskekongresy.cz.