Skip to main content

Security report for leikart.com

LEIKart · Finance · India

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LEIKart is an official Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) registration agent focused on serving Indian companies. The website offers streamlined LEI registration, renewal, and transfer services, partnering with accredited Local Operating Units such as Ubisecure Oy and Nasdaq CSD SE. With a large customer base and clear service offerings, LEIKart positions itself as a trusted intermediary in the LEI ecosystem for India. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Tailwind CSS and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, chat, and tag management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling, though explicit security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure full trust. Overall, LEIKart presents a professional, secure, and user-friendly platform for LEI services in India.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leikart.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LEIKart operates in the finance sector, specifically in legal entity identification services. Its business model revolves around acting as an official registration agent for LEI issuance and management, targeting Indian companies and legal entities. The website highlights a significant customer base, indicating market penetration and trust. Partnerships with accredited LOUs and integration with global LEI data sources like GLEIF strengthen its competitive advantage. Revenue streams likely include registration fees, renewals, and parental data validation services. The company emphasizes ease of use with online forms and quick turnaround times. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining domain legitimacy and expanding transparency around security and incident response to further enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and secure form submissions via WordPress and Caldera Forms. Use of reputable third-party services for chat and analytics is noted, with no exposed sensitive data detected. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LEIKart
Description
The official Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Registration Agent in India. Receive your LEI code in just a few hours.
Key services
LEI registration, LEI renewal, LEI transfer, LEI search and verification, LEI certificate and tag issuance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Caldera Forms, Rank Math SEO, Tailwind CSS, Tawk.to live chat, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form submission with CSRF tokens (implied by WordPress and Caldera Forms)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party services (Tawk.to, Google Tag Manager)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Bing UET
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional LEI registration service targeting Indian companies.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and SEO optimized.
  3. Multiple forms collect detailed company and applicant information securely.
  4. Use of reputable third-party services for chat, analytics, and tag management.
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant.
  9. Terms and conditions are clearly linked and accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Tailwind CSS for styling and uses jQuery and Caldera Forms for interactive form handling. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Bing UET indicates a mature analytics setup. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. SEO is well-implemented using Rank Math plugin with comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and the need for enhanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online service platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leikart.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leikart.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.