Skip to main content

Security report for lehtisepat.fi

Lehtisepät Oy · Media · Finland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lehtisepät Oy is a Finnish printing service company operating under the media group Keskisuomalainen Oyj. The company offers comprehensive printing services including design, printing, and distribution, targeting business clients primarily in Finland. The website reflects a mature and established business with a domain age dating back to 1991, consistent with the company's long-standing market presence. The company emphasizes environmental responsibility, holding ISO 14001 certification and aiming for carbon neutrality by 2030. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Tailwind CSS and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and includes a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. While the site uses HTTPS and some security best practices, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The WHOIS data confirms legitimate ownership by Keskisuomalainen Oyj, with no privacy protection, supporting transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it could benefit from enhanced security documentation and accessibility improvements. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, adding a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving accessibility compliance to strengthen the security and trust posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lehtisepat.fi

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lehtisepät Oy operates in the media sector, providing printing and distribution services primarily to business clients in Finland. The company benefits from being part of the Keskisuomalainen Oyj media group, which likely provides a strong market position and resource backing. The business model focuses on B2B services with a comprehensive offering from design to delivery. The company highlights environmental sustainability as a competitive advantage, aiming for carbon neutrality and offering climate-compensated products. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with over a hundred printing professionals and multiple printing locations. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a controlled communication channel via contact forms, possibly to manage inquiries efficiently. The company appears to maintain a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect its contact form from spam and abuse. It employs a cookie consent management system compliant with GDPR, indicating attention to privacy regulations. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could hinder transparency and preparedness in case of security incidents. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided information. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Keskisuomalainen Oyj
Registration number
0174445-8
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lehtisepät Oy
Description
Lehtisepät is an experienced Finnish printing service partner offering comprehensive printing services from design to printing and product distribution. It operates under the media group Keskisuomalainen Oyj and provides all services of the media group.
Key services
Printing, Mailing and distribution, Other printing-related services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA, Tailwind CSS, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent management with Gravito CMP

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Gravito CMP (consent management)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR.
  3. Contact form secured with Google reCAPTCHA.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  5. WHOIS data confirms long-standing registration and legitimate ownership.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. ISO 14001 environmental certification prominently mentioned.
  8. No social media links or direct email addresses publicly listed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern front-end technologies such as Tailwind CSS and Typekit fonts for styling and typography. It integrates Contact Form 7 for form handling and Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection. The site uses asynchronous font loading and preconnect/dns-prefetch hints to optimize performance. The presence of a cookie consent management system (Gravito CMP) indicates compliance with privacy regulations. The website is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lehtisepat.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lehtisepat.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.