Skip to main content

Security report for leecooper.com

Lee Cooper · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lee Cooper is a historic British denim brand established in 1908, with a strong market presence in the retail clothing sector. The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's Thunderbolt framework and standard web technologies. The site presents a professional design consistent with the brand's identity but lacks critical business and compliance information such as privacy policies and contact details. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers and unclear SSL configuration. The domain WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and registration consistency. Overall, the website serves its branding purpose but requires significant improvements in security, compliance, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of leecooper.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leecooper.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lee Cooper operates in the retail fashion sector focusing on denim apparel. The brand targets a general audience interested in British heritage denim products. The business model is retail and brand marketing, with a large market position as an iconic denim brand. The website does not reveal detailed business operations or partnerships. The lack of contact and compliance information limits business credibility. The site uses Wix as its CMS and hosting platform, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website lacks visible security headers and does not provide evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration details. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response contacts are found. Suspicious external scripts from non-standard domains are included, which may pose security risks. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the security maturity is low, exposing the site to potential vulnerabilities and compliance issues.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  3. Publish clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers.
  4. Audit and remove or verify suspicious external scripts to reduce security risks.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  6. Obtain and maintain accurate WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy.
  7. Consider adding incident response and vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. Improve SEO with structured data (JSON-LD) and enhance accessibility features.
  9. Regularly review third-party dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  10. Enhance transparency and trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lee Cooper
Description
Founded in London’s East End in 1908, Lee Cooper has a rich history spanning over a century, establishing its iconic status as the Original British Denim brand.
Key services
denim apparel manufacturing, brand marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, core-js polyfill, focus-within-polyfill, Wix Thunderbolt, Wix UI TPA, Google Fonts (Raleway)
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix technologies and scripts.
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain www.leecooper.com, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found in the provided HTML content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  5. External scripts from suspicious domains g10300385420.co and g9508048080.co detected, which may be ad or tracking related and require further investigation.
  6. No security headers or explicit security best practices detected in the HTML content.
  7. Website content is consistent with a retail denim brand with no adult or explicit content.
  8. No analytics or marketing tools explicitly detected beyond Wix platform scripts.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. SEO metadata present but basic; no JSON-LD structured data found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Wix, using Wix Thunderbolt framework and standard polyfills for browser compatibility. It loads multiple external scripts from Wix domains and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with basic SEO meta tags but lacks advanced structured data. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The presence of suspicious external script domains is a technical risk. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected in the HTML content provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leecooper.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leecooper.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.