Skip to main content

Security report for leeb.at

Leeb Balkone Gmbh · Real Estate · Austria

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leeb Balkone Gmbh is a European leader in the manufacturing and retail of balconies, fences, and related construction products, offering over 200 models made from wood, aluminum, and stainless steel. The company targets homeowners, builders, and architects across Europe, positioning itself as the number one brand in its sector. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as jQuery, Swiper, and Slick Carousel, supporting multilingual content and providing a good user experience with responsive design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and standard security headers, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the business identity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leeb.at

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on balcony and fencing solutions with a strong European presence. Its business model revolves around manufacturing and direct sales, supported by a multilingual website targeting multiple European markets. The brand maintains a consistent online presence with partner domains for different countries, enhancing market reach. The website's content and structure reflect a professional approach, though the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. The company leverages social media, particularly Facebook, for customer engagement and marketing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. The use of modern libraries and plugins indicates up-to-date technology usage, reducing vulnerability risks. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal, with no visible cookie consent or privacy policy, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking technologies.
  3. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and meet web standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leeb Balkone Gmbh
Description
Balkongeländer & Balkonbau ✓ Balkone, Geländer & Zäune aus Holz, Alu, Edelstahl ✓ Über 200 Modelle für Balkon & Zaun, Sichtschutz von Leeb Balkone.
Key services
Balcony construction, Balcony railings, Fences, Privacy screens
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Slick Carousel 1.8.1, Swiper 11.2.5, LightGallery 2.7.1, MegaMenu plugin, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed credentials in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Connect
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant and targeted to European customers interested in balconies and fences.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and multilingual support.
  5. No signs of malicious content or security issues in the HTML.
  6. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1 and uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, and Slick Carousel for interactive elements. It employs the WPML plugin for multilingual support, indicating a mature internationalization strategy. The presence of a MegaMenu plugin suggests advanced navigation capabilities. Performance is moderate, with CDN usage for some assets (cdn.jsdelivr.net) improving load times. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and formalize privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leeb.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leeb.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.