Skip to main content

Security report for leea-mv.de

Leea MV GmbH · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leea MV GmbH operates as a regional competence center for renewable energies in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany. The company focuses on education, awareness, and community engagement through its Erlebniswelt, Energie Lab, Leea Akademie, and event hosting services. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a clear mission to promote renewable energy understanding and participation among the general public. The business model is primarily educational and event-based, targeting families, schools, and stakeholders interested in sustainability and energy topics. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with common libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, and uses modern sliders and carousels for content presentation. Cookiebot is integrated for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms effectively. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not provide a dedicated security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with good privacy compliance and moderate technical sophistication. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and contact information clarity would enhance the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leea-mv.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention leea-mv.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for leea-mv.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leea MV GmbH holds a strong regional position as an educational and competence center for renewable energies. Its competitive advantage lies in combining experiential learning (Erlebniswelt), practical experimentation (Energie Lab), and event hosting to engage diverse audiences. The business model is non-profit/educational with revenue likely from event rentals and public funding. Target customers include families, schools, local government, and energy stakeholders. Growth indicators include active event calendars and academy offerings. Partnerships are evident with related domains like foerderung-leea-mv.de and social media presence on Facebook. The company maintains a consistent brand and content strategy focused on sustainability education.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and comprehensive cookie consent management via Cookiebot. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. GDPR compliance is well addressed through consent mechanisms and privacy policy. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site against common attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leea MV GmbH
Description
Verstehen – Erleben – Mitmachen! Komm und entdecke erneuerbare Energien. Erlebniswelt, Energie Lab, Leea Akademie, Leistungsschau, Kompetenzstandort, Meeting & Events.
Key services
Erlebniswelt (Experience world), Energie Lab (Energy Lab), Leea Akademie (Academy), Meeting & Events, Leistungsschau (Performance show), Förderberatung (Funding consulting)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, Bootstrap, MasterSlider, Owl Carousel, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in main HTML; contact form is primary contact method.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook link and Wikipedia reference.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML content.
  8. Website content is in German and targets regional audience interested in renewable energy education.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS platform with popular plugins and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and MasterSlider. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie management and GDPR compliance. The site is moderately performant with responsive design and SEO meta tags properly configured. Technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technology stack is modern but typical for regional educational websites, with no advanced custom frameworks detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leea-mv.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leea-mv.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.