Skip to main content

Security report for ledvance.se

LEDVANCE · Energy · Sweden

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LEDVANCE is a large international company specializing in LED lighting products and solutions targeting both professional and consumer markets. Their website offers localized content for multiple countries and regions, emphasizing lighting products, renewable energy, and smart lighting technologies. The company positions itself as a key player in the energy sector with a focus on modern lighting solutions. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Usercentrics for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the exact domain www.ledvance.se introduces uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with some best practices observed, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional and safe but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ledvance.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LEDVANCE operates in the energy sector focusing on lighting solutions, serving both professional and consumer segments. The business model revolves around manufacturing and distributing LED products, lighting solutions, and smart lighting technologies. The company maintains a broad international presence with localized websites for many countries, indicating a strong global footprint. Their partnership ecosystem includes regional sites such as the Benelux domain. The website content and structure suggest a mature business with a focus on innovation in renewable energy and smart lighting. Revenue streams likely include product sales and services related to lighting solutions. The absence of explicit contact information and company registration details on the website limits full business transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and integrates a consent management platform (Usercentrics) to comply with privacy regulations. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, with default consent settings denying ad and analytics storage until user consent. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were found to assess input validation or secure data handling. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, there is room for improvement to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities and improve compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LEDVANCE
Description
LEDVANCE is a company focused on lighting solutions including LED products, lighting solutions for professionals and consumers, renewable energy, and smart lighting technologies.
Key services
LED products, Lighting solutions, Renewable energy solutions, Smart lighting (SMART+), LED luminaires
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, RequireJS, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of consent management platform (Usercentrics)
  • Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking control

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No WHOIS data found for the exact domain www.ledvance.se, indicating possible subdomain usage or registration under a different domain.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented using Usercentrics.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management.
  7. Content is professional and targeted at both professional and consumer audiences in the lighting industry.
  8. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including RequireJS for module loading, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with multiple image sources for different screen sizes. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but could be improved. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of security headers and explicit privacy/legal pages suggests technical debt in compliance and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ledvance.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ledvance.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.