Skip to main content

Security report for ledvance.no

LEDVANCE · Energy · Norway

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LEDVANCE is a globally recognized lighting company offering a broad range of advanced and efficient lighting products targeting both professional lighting experts and consumers. The website reflects a strong market position as one of the world's leading suppliers in general lighting, with a business model serving both B2B and B2C segments. The site is well-branded and consistent, supporting a large international presence with multiple localized domains. Technically, the website employs modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ledvance.no

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ledvance.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ledvance.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LEDVANCE operates in the energy sector, specifically in lighting solutions, serving both professional and consumer markets. The company leverages a multi-regional presence with dedicated country domains, indicating a strong global footprint. Their business model includes product sales, lighting solutions, renewable energy offerings, and related services. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on brand consistency and customer segmentation. The absence of direct contact information on the landing page may indicate a preference for segmented access via professional or consumer portals. The company appears to maintain partnerships within the Benelux region and possibly other markets. The use of advanced consent management tools reflects awareness of regulatory compliance, although explicit policies are not visible in the provided content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of Usercentrics for cookie consent management, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, with ads data redaction enabled by default, indicating privacy-conscious tracking. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could hinder transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, published policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main site.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LEDVANCE
Description
LEDVANCE – vi utvikler lys. Som en av verdens ledende leverandører innen generell belysning for profesjonelle belysningseksperter og forbrukere, tilbyr vi et bredt utvalg av toppmoderne og effektive belysningsprodukter.
Key services
Lighting products, Lighting solutions, Renewable energy, Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management, RequireJS, Swiper CSS, Polyfills
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent management with Usercentrics
  • Ads data redaction enabled in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  3. Cookie consent is managed via Usercentrics with a consent mechanism in place.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. The site uses modern tracking and consent technologies but lacks visible security headers.
  6. The site targets both professional and consumer audiences with clear navigation.
  7. Multiple international domains indicate a global presence.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The presence of RequireJS and polyfills suggests support for modular JavaScript and cross-browser compatibility. The site appears to be built on Pimcore CMS, which is a flexible platform for enterprise content management. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive images. Mobile optimization is good, with adaptive images and viewport settings. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of explicit security headers and limited visible contact information suggest areas for technical improvement to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ledvance.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ledvance.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.