Skip to main content

Security report for ledvance.co.kr

LEDVANCE · Energy · South Korea

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LEDVANCE is a large, professional lighting company targeting both professional lighting experts and consumers with a wide range of efficient lighting products. The website reflects a consistent corporate brand with multi-language support, indicating a global presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and consent management tools, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy policies. The security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and contact availability. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces trustworthiness and suggests a need for verification of domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ledvance.co.kr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LEDVANCE positions itself as a leading provider in the general lighting sector, serving both professional and consumer markets. The business model focuses on product provision and lighting solutions. The website's multi-regional presence and language options indicate a broad market reach. However, the lack of visible contact details and corporate registration information on the site limits direct customer engagement. The company appears to maintain a strong brand identity and leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for consent management. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified on the site.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates consent management to comply with privacy regulations. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Security headers are not detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of contact information for incident response reduces the site's readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider registering domain WHOIS information publicly or ensuring privacy protection is justified and transparent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LEDVANCE
Description
LEDVANCE - we advance light. As one of the world's leading providers in general lighting for professional lighting experts and consumers we offer a wide range of state-of-the-art and efficient lighting products.
Key services
general lighting products, professional lighting solutions, consumer lighting products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management, RequireJS, Swiper CSS, JavaScript ES6 Modules
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Consent management with Usercentrics
  • Google Tag Manager with consent defaults set to denied
  • Ads data redaction enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected on the main page.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Usercentrics.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the main page.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered according to registry response.
  6. Website targets professional and consumer lighting markets.
  7. Multiple language versions and regional sites are linked.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. Website uses modern JavaScript and consent management tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including RequireJS and ES6 modules, along with Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. CSS frameworks like Swiper are used for UI components. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and viewport settings. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous script loading. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt is low but security and compliance documentation need improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ledvance.co.kr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ledvance.co.kr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.