Skip to main content

Security report for lecba-rakoviny.com

S. A. B. Impex, s.r.o. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lecba-rakoviny.com is an information portal focused on modern cancer treatment technologies, operated by the company S. A. B. Impex, s.r.o., based in the Czech Republic. The domain has been active since 2013, indicating a stable presence in the healthcare information niche. The site uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and tracking purposes. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is limited as no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found, though a cookie policy with consent mechanism is present. Overall, the website is professional and relevant to its target audience but would benefit from improved security and privacy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lecba-rakoviny.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically providing information on advanced cancer treatment technologies. The company targets patients and individuals seeking innovative medical solutions. The business model appears to be informational, possibly supporting technology adoption or awareness. The market position is niche with a focus on Czech-speaking audiences. The company is small-sized with no evident subsidiaries or parent companies. The website content is consistent and professionally branded, though lacks some trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is available on the site. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR due to missing privacy policy and data protection officer information. The site uses Google Tag Manager, which implies some level of user tracking, but privacy compliance is minimal. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and incident response purposes.
  5. Develop and communicate an incident response plan and security policy to build trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
S. A. B. Impex, s.r.o.
Description
Přinášíme nejmodernější technologie pro léčbu rakoviny, se kterými stoupá úspěšnost léčby nádorů a léčka je šetrnější a rychlejší.
Key services
Modern cancer treatment technologies information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Divi Theme, WordPress
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare, specifically modern cancer treatment technologies.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page.
  4. Cookie policy is present with consent mechanism.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. Domain is registered since 2013 with a reputable registrar.
  9. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  10. No security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS platform. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is hosted by Gransy, s.r.o., a Czech hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical debt is minimal but security enhancements are needed. The site does not use DNSSEC and lacks security headers, which are modernization opportunities. No critical technical risks were detected that would impact business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lecba-rakoviny.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lecba-rakoviny.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.