Skip to main content

Security report for leading-medicine-guide.de

Deutscher Verlag für Gesundheitsinformation GmbH · Healthcare · Germany

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leading Medicine Guide is a German healthcare expert portal operated by Deutscher Verlag für Gesundheitsinformation GmbH, founded in 2001. The website provides a curated directory of highly qualified German medical specialists and clinics across various medical fields, targeting patients and healthcare consumers seeking expert medical advice and treatment options in Germany. The business model centers on providing trusted healthcare information and facilitating connections between patients and medical professionals. The site maintains a consistent brand presence and good content quality, supporting its niche market position in the German healthcare sector. Technically, the website employs a moderate technology stack including jQuery, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Matomo for analytics, and Google Tag Manager. It uses HTTPS and includes structured data for SEO and social media integration. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and accessibility features, although some improvements in security headers and performance optimization could be made. From a security perspective, the site implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls, indicating good privacy compliance efforts. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content, and WHOIS data is missing or domain registration is unconfirmed, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. No security policy or incident response information is published, and security headers appear absent, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content and business presentation but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration, explicit privacy and security policies, and improved security best practices to strengthen user trust and compliance with data protection regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leading-medicine-guide.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
88
Average
51
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention leading-medicine-guide.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for leading-medicine-guide.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leading Medicine Guide operates in the healthcare information sector, focusing on providing expert medical specialist and clinic listings in Germany. Its competitive advantage lies in its curated, high-quality content and association with Deutscher Verlag für Gesundheitsinformation GmbH, a reputable publisher. The business model likely includes advertising and lead generation through its directory services. The target customer segment includes patients and healthcare consumers seeking specialized medical care. The presence of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates active digital marketing efforts. Growth potential exists in expanding services and partnerships within the healthcare ecosystem. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a risk factor but does not currently undermine the site's operational credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a detailed cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration ambiguity represent a potential risk. Overall, the site should enhance its security posture by implementing recommended HTTP security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing clear incident response channels to improve resilience and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Deutscher Verlag für Gesundheitsinformation GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deutscher Verlag für Gesundheitsinformation GmbH
Description
Das Experten-Portal Leading Medicine Guide präsentiert hochqualifizierte deutsche Fachärzte und Kliniken in den verschiedenen medizinischen Fachbereichen.
Key services
Listing of qualified German medical specialists, Information about clinics in various medical fields
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, OpenLayers (mapping library)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Matomo
Marketing tools
Zoho Survey, Click Funnels, Ablyft
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. Business information is clearly presented with company name, address, and contact details.
  5. Use of multiple external marketing and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Website content is healthcare-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional jQuery-based frontend with additional libraries for UI and tracking. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Matomo is used for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-focused analytics. Google Tag Manager and Google Adsense are also present for marketing and advertising. The site uses OpenLayers for map-related features. Performance is moderate with some preloading of fonts and CSS optimizations via pagespeed. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leading-medicine-guide.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leading-medicine-guide.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.