Skip to main content

Security report for lccoil.com

Lissan Coal Company · Energy · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LCC Oil is a small, family-owned energy supplier specializing in home heating oil and coal, serving the Cookstown area and beyond. Established in 1997 as part of Lissan Coal Company, it has grown steadily with a focus on competitive pricing, fast delivery, and customer satisfaction. The company offers online ordering and instant price quotes, targeting both domestic and commercial customers including the agriculture sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and a customer login portal. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Blazor and Bootstrap, with Google reCAPTCHA integrated for bot protection. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics. Hosting appears to be managed via GoDaddy, consistent with the domain registrar information. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements basic security best practices, but lacks DNSSEC and standard security headers. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could be improved to enhance security posture. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, showing a long-established domain with appropriate protections against unauthorized changes. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in security policies and contact information transparency. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and enhancing transparency around security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lccoil.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LCC Oil operates in the energy sector as a regional supplier of heating oil and coal, leveraging a direct-to-customer business model with online ordering capabilities. Its competitive advantage lies in its established local presence, family-owned reputation, and fast delivery service. The company targets both domestic households and commercial/agricultural clients, indicating a diversified customer base. The business model focuses on volume sales with competitive pricing, supported by digital tools such as instant online quotes and customer login portals. Growth indicators include expanded geographical coverage and service range since inception. The company maintains a social media presence on Facebook to communicate price updates and engage customers. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA deployed to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and common security headers reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security score reflects a need for improvements in DNS security and header implementation to better protect users and the business.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility on the website to improve customer trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lissan Coal Company
Description
LCC Oil is a home heating oil and coal supplier delivering in the Cookstown area and beyond. It is a family owned and managed business established in 1997 as part of Lissan Coal Company. The company offers competitive heating oil prices, fast delivery, and customer satisfaction all year round. It serves domestic customers as well as major commercial companies and the agriculture industry.
Key services
Home heating oil supply, Coal supply, Online ordering and instant quotes, Fast delivery service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Blazor, Bootstrap, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Blazor
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is relevant and professionally presented for an energy supply business.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML.
  5. Use of modern web technologies like Blazor and Bootstrap.
  6. Security practices are basic but adequate; improvements recommended.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on Blazor for client-side interactivity and Bootstrap for responsive design. Google reCAPTCHA integration helps prevent automated abuse. The site is hosted likely via GoDaddy, consistent with the domain registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical scripts and use of integrity attributes for script security. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and accessible navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based site. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lccoil.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lccoil.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.