Skip to main content

Security report for lbta.lt

LithuaniaBIO · Healthcare · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LithuaniaBIO is a Lithuanian non-governmental association representing companies and institutions in biotechnology, life sciences, and health technologies. It promotes innovation and collaboration within these sectors, focusing on bioeconomy, medical technologies, and life sciences. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins and offers multilingual support. Contact information and social media presence are clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance scores. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and standard security practices but could improve by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, LithuaniaBIO's digital presence supports its role as a key sector association in Lithuania, but improvements in privacy and security documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lbta.lt

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lbta.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lbta.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LithuaniaBIO occupies a strategic position in Lithuania's biotechnology and life sciences ecosystem, connecting academia, industry, and healthcare institutions. Its business model centers on membership services, advocacy, and facilitating innovation. The association's growth is supported by a rapidly expanding Lithuanian life sciences sector and active participation in regional initiatives. Partnerships with organizations like LBTA strengthen its network. The website content and structure reflect a medium-sized organization with a clear focus on sector promotion and member engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to HTTP responses.
  4. Publish security and incident response policies to increase transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LithuaniaBIO
Description
LithuaniaBIO is a non-governmental organization representing companies, research and study institutions, and healthcare institutions in diagnostics, health technologies, and biotechnology. It promotes life sciences and biotechnology applications in the Lithuanian economy, focusing on bioeconomy, medical technologies, and life sciences.
Key services
Representation of members, Promotion of biotechnology and life sciences, Facilitation of projects and collaborations, Membership services, Events and news dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, PHP, jQuery, Modern Events Calendar Lite plugin, Slider Revolution, Ultimate VC Addons, Indeed Membership Pro, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder, Elementor (detected generator tag), The7 WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional association site for LithuaniaBIO, focused on biotechnology and life sciences.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multilingual support (English and Lithuanian).
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the analyzed page.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in header and contact page.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes indicates moderate technical maturity.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.5 using a combination of popular plugins including Modern Events Calendar Lite, Slider Revolution, Ultimate VC Addons, and Indeed Membership Pro. It uses jQuery and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some heavy slider elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a medium-sized association website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lbta.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lbta.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.