Skip to main content

Security report for lbpeng.dk

Artelia | Rådgivende Ingeniører · Energy · Denmark

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Artelia is a leading Danish consulting engineering firm specializing in construction, energy, industry, and infrastructure sectors. The company positions itself as a key player in Denmark's engineering consultancy market, offering expert advisory services to a targeted professional audience. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a solid market presence since its founding in 2015. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance optimizations, including the use of Google Fonts, LayerSlider, and Cloudflare CDN services. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, reCAPTCHA integration, and cookie consent mechanisms, although formal security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, supporting the company's credibility and business operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lbpeng.dk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lbpeng.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lbpeng.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Artelia operates in the essential engineering consultancy sector with a focus on energy, construction, and infrastructure. Its business model centers on providing expert advisory services to Danish clients, leveraging its market leadership. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and a well-structured digital footprint. While no explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified, the company uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing. Growth indicators include a comprehensive web presence and active content updates. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact via forms, possibly to manage inquiries efficiently.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and security headers implemented. Use of reCAPTCHA protects forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate compliance with GDPR. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security score is solid but could be improved by publishing formal security documentation and enhancing accessibility compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for all users.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding direct contact information such as verified company emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Artelia | Rådgivende Ingeniører
Description
Artelia er en af Danmarks førende rådgivende ingeniørvirksomheder inden for Byggeri, Energi & Industri og Infrastruktur.
Key services
Byggeri (Construction), Energi & Industri (Energy & Industry), Infrastruktur (Infrastructure)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Google Fonts, LayerSlider, Rank Math SEO, Cloudflare (CDN and security), reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
LinkedIn Insight, Google reCAPTCHA
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on Danish engineering consultancy market
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanism
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Fonts, LayerSlider for animations, and Rank Math for SEO optimization. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare CDN and AWS infrastructure, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features, though these could be improved. Performance is moderate, with caching and asset optimization evident. The technical stack is well-maintained, but ongoing monitoring of plugin and script security is recommended to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lbpeng.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lbpeng.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.