Skip to main content

Security report for lazer.lv

Daktera Kuzņecova klīnika "Acu Mikroķirurģijas Centrs" · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daktera Kuzņecova klīnika, branded as "Acu Mikroķirurģijas Centrs," is a specialized healthcare provider focused on eye microsurgery and vision correction services. The clinic emphasizes its 25 years of experience and offers advanced technologies accessible to patients aged 18 and above. The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix Thunderbolt framework and integrates analytics and monitoring tools such as Google Analytics and Sentry. The digital infrastructure is modern but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The site is accessible without any WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating good availability. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy healthcare service with room for improvement in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lazer.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector within Latvia, targeting a general audience seeking eye microsurgery and vision correction. Its market position is supported by a long operational history (25 years) and claims of exclusive technologies. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on patient care and advanced medical procedures. The website's content and structured data reflect a clear business identity, but the lack of visible privacy and security policies may impact customer trust. The use of Wix as a platform suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with moderate digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and uses reputable third-party services for analytics and error monitoring. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely security issue management. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and forms are minimal or absent, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Daktera Kuzņecova klīnika "Acu Mikroķirurģijas Centrs"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daktera Kuzņecova klīnika "Acu Mikroķirurģijas Centrs"
Description
Acu Mikroķirurģijas Centrs. Jauna Kvalitāte Redzei un Dzīvei. Mēs lepojamies ar rezultātiem, ko esam sasnieguši 25 gadu laikā redzes korekcijas jomā. Mūsu ekskluzīvās tehnoloģijas ir pieejamas visu vecumu pacientiem, sākot no 18 gadu vecuma.
Key services
eye microsurgery, vision correction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix, Google Analytics, Sentry
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website built on Wix platform with standard Wix technologies
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in HTML content
  4. Contact information present in structured data but no contact forms detected in provided HTML snippet
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Sentry for monitoring and analytics
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No evidence of security or incident response policies published
  8. Content is healthcare related, safe for general audience
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt rendering engine, which provides a modern and responsive design framework. It integrates Google Analytics and Sentry for performance monitoring and error tracking. The site loads moderate external resources from Wix static domains and Google services. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses standard meta tags and structured data for SEO. However, the performance is moderate, possibly due to multiple external scripts and lack of advanced caching or optimization techniques. Accessibility is basic, with scope for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. The technical debt appears low given the managed platform but reliance on third-party scripts requires ongoing vigilance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lazer.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lazer.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.