Skip to main content

Security report for laudert.de

Laudert GmbH + Co. KG · Media · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Laudert GmbH + Co. KG is a European leader in holistic product communication, offering consulting, tools, content, and channel services primarily targeting businesses seeking to enhance their product messaging. The company positions itself as a highly effective partner in the media sector, with a professional and well-branded online presence. The website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and privacy compliance features, including a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policy. Technically, the site employs standard web technologies and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and Content-Security-Policy headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a notable anomaly that warrants further investigation. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and a high level of professionalism, supporting the company's market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laudert.de

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Laudert operates in the media and product communication sector, focusing on consulting and digital tools to support product messaging across channels. Their business model revolves around service provision to other businesses, likely generating revenue through consulting contracts and software tools. The company targets European markets and maintains a consistent brand identity with active social media channels on LinkedIn and Instagram. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise founded around 2018. The lack of WHOIS data is unusual and may reflect privacy protection or domain registration issues. The company does not publicly disclose certifications or detailed security policies, which could be areas for future enhancement to strengthen trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a Content-Security-Policy header, indicating a good baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of a security.txt file and incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which could pose risks if unresolved. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by publishing explicit security policies and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  2. Add explicit incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration data to ensure legitimacy and trust.
  4. Consider publishing formal security policies and certifications to enhance credibility.
  5. Enhance contact information availability by including verified company emails and phone numbers on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Laudert GmbH + Co. KG
Description
Laudert ist Europas wirksamster Partner für ganzheitliche Produktkommunikation
Key services
Consulting, Tools, Content, Channels
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and well-structured website with strong SEO and privacy compliance.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and controls.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not registered, which is unusual and requires further verification.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Social media presence confirmed on LinkedIn and Instagram.
  7. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found.
  8. No explicit certifications or security policies published on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The technical implementation includes modern HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate script injection risks. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely influenced by external scripts and media content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is mature and supports the business needs effectively, though opportunities exist to improve security transparency and domain registration clarity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laudert.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laudert.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.