Skip to main content

Security report for latvijasvinature.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.latvijasvinature.lv serves as a regional tourism promotion platform focused on Latvian fruit and berry wine producers. It targets wine enthusiasts and tourists interested in exploring local wineries and wine tours across Latvia. The site provides detailed information about various wineries in different Latvian regions and encourages visitors to participate in wine tasting events and tours. The business model centers on collaboration with local wineries and promoting regional tourism experiences. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including Material Design Lite, Leaflet.js for maps, and Matomo for analytics, with Django likely as the backend framework. The site is mobile optimized and offers multilingual support, enhancing accessibility for international visitors. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS and CSRF protections are implied, the absence of explicit security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content quality but lacks some compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching latvijasvinature.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche position in the Latvian hospitality and tourism sector, focusing on promoting local wine culture and tourism. Its competitive advantage lies in its collaboration with multiple small wineries across Latvia, offering a unique regional experience. Revenue streams likely include tourism promotion partnerships and event-driven activities. The target customer segment is mature tourists and wine aficionados interested in local and artisanal wines. The partnership with KA2 and support from Latvian agricultural ministries indicates a credible ecosystem. Growth potential exists in expanding digital presence and adding e-commerce or booking capabilities. Strategic observations include the need to enhance digital trust signals and compliance to attract a broader international audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS implied and CSRF tokens used in forms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense against common web attacks. No privacy or incident response policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. The use of Matomo analytics shows some privacy-conscious tracking but without clear data retention policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and HSTS header.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  3. Deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A Latvian wine tourism initiative promoting visits to local fruit and berry wineries across Latvia, encouraging wine tasting and exploration of local wine culture.
Key services
Information about Latvian wineries, Wine tours, Travel guidance for wine tasting, Event invitations for wine tasting
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Material Design Lite, Leaflet.js, Matomo Analytics, Google Play Store link
Frameworks
Material Design Lite, Django
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token used in language selection form
  • HTTPS implied but not confirmed from data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian wine tourism promotional site with multilingual support.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner present with consent mechanism.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on homepage.
  6. Uses Matomo analytics for tracking.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  9. Content is mature due to alcohol promotion but no adult explicit content.
  10. Powered by KA2, a Latvian digital agency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Material Design Lite and Leaflet.js for interactive maps, supported by a Django backend indicated by CSRF tokens and i18n URL patterns. Analytics are handled by Matomo, a privacy-focused tool. The site is multilingual and mobile optimized, with a moderate performance profile. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The absence of security headers and explicit SSL details suggests technical debt in security configuration. The site could benefit from improved SEO meta tags and accessibility compliance to enhance discoverability and usability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with latvijasvinature.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latvijasvinature.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.