Skip to main content

Security report for latvijasnamipasumi.lv

SIA “Latvijas Namīpašumi” · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA “Latvijas Namīpašumi” is a Latvian real estate company specializing in property brokerage and purchasing services across Latvia. The company emphasizes fast and secure property transactions, offering services such as debt clearance, property valuation, and legal transaction handling. Their website reflects a small but professional business with clear contact information and a focus on customer convenience. The company targets property owners and sellers in Latvia, leveraging 15 years of market experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching latvijasnamipasumi.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector with a business model centered on direct property purchase and brokerage. Their competitive advantage lies in quick transaction processing, legal correctness, and transparent dealings. The website indicates a focus on local Latvian customers, with multilingual support (Latvian and Russian). The presence of bank details and company registration number adds to business credibility. The company uses common digital marketing and analytics tools but lacks published privacy and security policies, which may affect compliance and trust.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements basic anti-spam measures in forms. However, it lacks important security headers and does not publish security policies or incident response information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates GDPR compliance gaps. Tracking technologies like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar are used, suggesting moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, privacy notices, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību “Latvijas Namīpašumi”
Registration number
40103945844
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Latvijas Namīpašumi”
Description
SIA “Latvijas Namīpašumi” ir nekustamo īpašumu kompānija, kas specializējusies un aktīvi darbojas nekustamo īpašumu tirgū visā Latvijas teritorijā.
Key services
Real estate purchase, Brokerage services, Property valuation, Debt clearance and encumbrance removal, Legal transaction handling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada theme, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Contact Form 7, WPML (multilingual plugin), Social Pug (social sharing), Honeypot anti-spam
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of honeypot anti-spam in forms
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Social Pug
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Avada theme.
  2. Content is focused on real estate brokerage and property purchase in Latvia.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and contact form.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  5. No security policies or incident response information published.
  6. Use of multiple tracking and analytics services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust assessment.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, a popular and feature-rich framework. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and multilingual support via WPML. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with latvijasnamipasumi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latvijasnamipasumi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.