SIA Šurfs · Energy · Latvia
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
SIA Šurfs operates the website www.latgalesgeologs.lv, providing specialized geological, geotechnical, and hydrogeological services primarily in Latvia. Established in 2008, the company offers water supply drilling, mineral deposit documentation, environmental impact assessments, and related consulting services. The website also promotes tourism services related to the Latgale region. The business targets local clients requiring geological expertise and related services, positioning itself as a small but experienced regional player. The website content is professional, well-structured, and consistent with the company's stated expertise and market focus. Technically, the website leverages a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics, Mapbox for geolocation, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. It is built on a CMS platform likely provided by multiscreensite.com, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though some improvements in security headers and explicit security policies could enhance the site's posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and employs reCAPTCHA on contact forms to mitigate spam. Cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy indicate awareness of GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are published, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional front for a small Latvian geological services company. The absence of WHOIS data and some missing security headers suggest areas for improvement. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing detailed security and incident response policies, and ensuring regular updates of third-party libraries to maintain security and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention latgalesgeologs.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for latgalesgeologs.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with latgalesgeologs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latgalesgeologs.lv.