Skip to main content

Security report for latartaka.lv

SIA Latgales artēziskā aka · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Latgales artēziskā aka is a Latvian company specializing in artesian well drilling and water supply services, established in 1994. The company positions itself as a leader in Latvia for industrial, municipal, and residential water well projects, offering a comprehensive range of services including design, drilling, pump installation, and well maintenance. Their website reflects a professional business presence with clear contact details and service descriptions tailored to their target audience in the energy and water supply sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Smart Slider 3 and Contact Form 7, indicating a standard CMS infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes basic SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and a cookie consent banner is present, but security headers are lacking and no advanced security policies or incident response information is published. The security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but improvements are recommended in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and professionally maintained, with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic improvements in security practices and transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching latartaka.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention latartaka.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for latartaka.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector focusing on water supply infrastructure through artesian well drilling. Its market position as a leader in Latvia is supported by over 20 years of experience and a skilled team of drillers and geologists. The business model is service-oriented, targeting industrial, municipal, and residential clients. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts for well design, drilling, equipment installation, and maintenance services. The website indicates a focus on local Latvian markets with no evident international subsidiaries or partnerships. The presence of media logos suggests some marketing and public relations efforts. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service offering and a professional online presence. The company’s ecosystem appears self-contained with no visible external partnerships or subsidiaries linked on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent is managed via a visible banner, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is published, which limits readiness transparency. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present. The site uses standard WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved with enhanced headers, incident response transparency, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response contact or security policy page to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Latgales artēziskā aka
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Latgales artēziskā aka
Description
SIA Latgales artēziskā aka is a Latvian company founded in 1994 specializing in drilling and equipping artesian water wells, including design, approval, drilling, pump installation, well repair, flushing, disinfection, and geothermal well installation. They serve industrial sites, villages, and private homes across Latvia.
Key services
Artesian well design and approval, Well drilling and pump installation, Well repair, flushing, and disinfection, Geothermal well installation, Consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), Smart Slider 3 plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Cookie Notice plugin, SiteOrigin Panels plugin, Google Fonts (Roboto, Montserrat, Open Sans), jQuery 3.7.1
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins.
  4. Clear contact information and privacy policy present.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. Cookie consent banner implemented and functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with common plugins including Smart Slider 3, Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice, and SiteOrigin Panels. It uses Google Fonts (Roboto, Montserrat, Open Sans) and jQuery 3.7.1. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and basic SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. The hosting provider is not identified from the HTML content. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress are used. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website, functional but with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with latartaka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latartaka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.