Skip to main content

Security report for laneshealth.com

Lanes Health · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lanes Health is a well-established family-owned healthcare company with over 90 years of experience in manufacturing and distributing OTC medicines, food supplements, natural products, and confectionery. The company maintains a strong market presence in the UK and internationally through a portfolio of trusted brands such as Olbas, Jakemans, Kalms, and others. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting consumers, pharmacists, and retailers seeking quality health and wellbeing products. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager with privacy-conscious configurations such as IP anonymization. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some technical improvements could be made, such as implementing security headers and enhancing accessibility features. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, despite the professional appearance and business information presented. Overall, the website is functional, secure, and compliant with privacy standards, but the domain registration inconsistency warrants further investigation. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laneshealth.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lanes Health operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on OTC medicines and natural health products. The company leverages a portfolio of iconic UK brands with a heritage dating back over 90 years, positioning itself as a trusted partner for consumers and retailers. Their business model centers on manufacturing, brand management, and global partnerships to expand market reach. The presence of multiple industry certifications and active community responsibility initiatives indicates a mature and reputable organization. The website content and structure support their market positioning, highlighting product ranges, company culture, and recent news, which suggests ongoing growth and engagement with stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics configurations. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others is a gap that could be exploited. No incident response or security contact information is published, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in header configuration and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure consistency and enhance trustworthiness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
G.R. Lane Health Products Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lanes Health
Description
Lanes Health is a family company with over 90 years’ experience promoting health and wellbeing, offering a wide range of OTC medicines, food supplements, natural products and confectionery trusted worldwide.
Key services
OTC medicines, Food supplements, Natural products, Confectionery, Global brand partnerships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS database
  4. Strong branding and multiple trusted certifications displayed
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and GDPR compliant
  6. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML, but phone and address present
  7. Use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization indicates privacy awareness
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found
  9. No security headers detected in HTML source (headers not provided in data)
  10. Website uses modern front-end technologies and responsive design
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Analytics along with Google Tag Manager are integrated for traffic analysis with IP anonymization enabled. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly, providing a good user experience across devices. Performance appears moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and resource management. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected from the HTML content. The site structure includes semantic markup and JSON-LD structured data for SEO benefits. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and accessibility improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laneshealth.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laneshealth.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.