Skip to main content

Security report for landscapeconstruction.lv

Landscape Construction · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Landscape Construction is a Latvian company specializing in professional territory landscaping and construction services, catering to both private residential gardens and large public projects such as the Lielā Dziesmusvētku estrāde. The company offers a broad range of services including full-cycle garden construction, maintenance, and supply of professional landscaping materials sourced from globally recognized manufacturers. The website reflects a small-sized business with a clear focus on quality and local market presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a modern and maintainable digital infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are good, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy or terms policies found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landscapeconstruction.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a reliable partner for both private and public landscaping projects in Latvia, with a portfolio showcasing significant projects like the national botanical garden and large event venues. Their business model combines service provision with material supply, leveraging partnerships with reputable manufacturers. The target customers include homeowners and municipal clients. The website's content and portfolio suggest a growing business with a focus on quality and professionalism. Marketing tools include Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics for tracking user engagement. The absence of social media links may indicate a focus on direct client relationships or offline marketing. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and content quality, supporting its market credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions, particularly form submissions. However, no advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations, but the lack of a detailed privacy policy reduces compliance confidence. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from additional hardening and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
  2. Publish detailed privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Consider adding verified company contact emails and physical address to improve business credibility and compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct performance optimizations to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Landscape Construction
Description
Profesionāla teritorijas labiekārtošana. Teritoriju labiekārtojuma būvniecība no privātmājas dārza līdz Lielajai Dziesmusvētku estrādei. Plašs pakalpojumu klāsts no teritorijas būvniecības materiāliem līdz pilna servisa teritorijas apzaļumošanai un uzturēšanai. Pārstāv profesionālu teritoriju labiekārtošanas materiālu ražotājus no visas pasaules, tostarp bruģa, segumu un āra mēbeļu ražotājus.
Key services
Privātmāju dārzu labiekārtošana un uzturēšana, Publisko teritoriju būvniecība un uzturēšana, Labiekārtošanas materiāli profesionāļiem
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Fonts, SiteGround Optimizer, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and active.
  5. Contact phone number clearly displayed in header.
  6. Multiple portfolio projects with images demonstrate business activity.
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  10. No email addresses explicitly found in provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. It uses Google Fonts and jQuery libraries, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting appears to be with SiteGround, inferred from the optimizer plugin. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. The site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy/legal pages, which are recommended for compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landscapeconstruction.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landscapeconstruction.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.