Skip to main content

Security report for lande.lv

LANDE Platform SIA · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LANDE Platform SIA is a Latvian financial services company specializing in providing flexible financing solutions tailored for farmers and agricultural businesses. Their offerings include loans without collateral, financing for raw materials, agricultural machinery, and support for LAD projects. The company targets small to medium-sized agricultural enterprises primarily in Latvia and neighboring countries. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information and customer testimonials, enhancing trust and credibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. Security measures include HTTPS, domain locking, and form validation, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website demonstrates a good security posture and compliance with privacy regulations, including GDPR. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security policy, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lande.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LANDE Platform operates in a niche market segment providing agricultural financing, which differentiates it from general financial institutions. Their business model focuses on personalized loan products adapted to the seasonal and operational needs of farmers, including innovative offerings like loans against future harvests and group purchasing benefits through their farmers' club. The company leverages partnerships with agricultural suppliers and uses digital marketing tools to reach its target audience effectively. The presence of named credit specialists and transparent contact details suggests a customer-centric approach. Founded recently in 2023, LANDE is positioning itself as a flexible and understanding financial partner for the agricultural sector, which is reflected in their marketing and service offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections that prevent unauthorized changes. Use of security plugins and form validation reduces risk of common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy) indicates room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could affect transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good for a small financial services website but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security with anti-CSRF tokens and spam protection mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LANDE Platform SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LANDE Platform SIA
Description
Finanțare pentru fermieri (Financing for farmers). Provides flexible financing solutions for farmers including loans without collateral, financing for agricultural machinery, LAD projects, and a farmers' club offering discounts and group purchases.
Key services
Loans without collateral, Financing for raw materials and working capital, Loans for agricultural machinery purchase and repair, Financing for LAD projects, Farmers' club with partner offers and group purchases
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP, W3 Total Cache plugin, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS, Fancybox UI, Splide slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by classes), Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple client status flags
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (W3 Total Cache)
  • Form validation present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on agricultural financing services in Latvia and nearby regions.
  3. Multiple contact methods and named specialists increase trust.
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Security posture is good but can be improved with DNSSEC and additional headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including W3 Total Cache for performance, WPML for multilingual support, and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses Bootstrap-based responsive design ensuring good mobile experience. Integration with HubSpot and Google Tag Manager supports marketing and analytics needs. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services and GoDaddy registrar. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and SEO meta tags. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and incomplete security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lande.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lande.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.