Skip to main content

Security report for lande.finance

LANDE Platform Ltd. · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LANDE Platform Ltd. operates a professional crowdfunding platform specializing in secured agricultural loans, targeting investors interested in diversifying portfolios with agricultural projects. Licensed by the Latvian Financial and Capital Market Supervisory Authority and partnered with Lemon Way for payment processing, LANDE positions itself as a trustworthy European fintech player. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides multilingual support, enhancing user experience and accessibility. The platform offers features such as primary and secondary markets, auto-invest strategies, and detailed investment reporting, catering to a sophisticated investor base. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates analytics and tracking tools responsibly with cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, domain locking, and CSRF protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Overall, LANDE demonstrates a mature digital presence with high trustworthiness and compliance, though improvements in transparency around security policies and incident response could further enhance confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lande.finance

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LANDE's market positioning as a licensed European crowdfunding service provider focused on agriculture gives it a niche competitive advantage. Its business model revolves around connecting investors with secured agricultural loans, offering both primary and secondary market options. Revenue streams likely include fees on investments and loan servicing. The target audience includes retail and institutional investors seeking alternative investments with moderate risk and attractive returns. The company shows growth indicators through active projects, investor counts, and published testimonials. Partnerships with payment institutions and fintech comparison sites strengthen its ecosystem. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining regulatory compliance, expanding multilingual support, and enhancing investor education to sustain growth and market trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, domain status protections, and CSRF token usage. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent compliance gaps. Data protection practices appear aligned with GDPR, supported by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing explicit contacts. The security culture is implied by transparency documents and licensing but could benefit from more visible security communication. Overall, the platform maintains a good security posture suitable for its fintech operations but should address minor gaps to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  3. Implement and publicize a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Add clear contact information for security incidents and abuse reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LANDE Platform Ltd.
Description
Crowdfunding platform where farmers get funded. Invest and diversify your portfolio with secured agricultural loans.
Key services
Primary Market agricultural loans, Secondary Market for loan trading, Auto invest strategy, Income statement reports, Affiliate and referral programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Glide.js (carousel), Google Fonts (Montserrat, Rubik, Roboto), Leaflet.js (mapping), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookie Script
Frameworks
Bootstrap 5
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple client status prohibitions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF token meta tag
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional crowdfunding platform focused on agricultural loans.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and multilingual support is present.
  3. Strong trust signals including licensing, partner payment institution, and user testimonials.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site; contact likely via help center.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools with cookie consent.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Security posture is good but could improve DNSSEC and explicit security policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, responsive infrastructure using Bootstrap 5 and JavaScript libraries like Glide.js and Leaflet.js for UI components and mapping. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and efficient asset management. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is addressed with semantic HTML and responsive design. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party scripts and absence of DNSSEC. Opportunities exist to enhance security transparency and automate compliance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lande.finance. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lande.finance.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.