Skip to main content

Security report for lanakendrick.com

LanaKendrick.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LanaKendrick.com is an adult entertainment subscription website specializing in exclusive photos and videos of the model Lana Kendrick. The site targets adult audiences with explicit content and maintains legal compliance through age verification and 18 U.S.C. 2257 record-keeping statements. Technically, the site uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI libraries, delivering a responsive and visually consistent user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent, but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, impacting overall trust. The site integrates multiple payment and affiliate partners, supporting a subscription business model. Privacy and terms policies are present, but direct company contact information is missing, limiting transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lanakendrick.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche adult media sector, leveraging a subscription model to monetize exclusive content. It benefits from a 25-year legacy in the busty pinup niche, positioning itself as a specialized provider with a loyal audience. The company partners with established payment processors and affiliate networks, indicating a mature operational ecosystem. Social media presence across major platforms supports marketing and audience engagement. However, the lack of visible registrant data and direct contact details may hinder trust and customer confidence. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and enhancing transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No dedicated security policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap for compliance and customer assurance. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates regular vulnerability assessments. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing verifiable company contact details and WHOIS information.
  5. Improve privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and GDPR adherence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LanaKendrick.com
Description
Official website offering exclusive adult content including photos and videos of Lana Kendrick, updated regularly with personal and exclusive material.
Key services
Exclusive photos, Exclusive videos, Membership access, Streaming and downloads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Modernizr, Font Awesome 4.7.0, jQuery UI, Isotope, MediaElement.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by base href https://)
  • Age verification popup with cookie consent
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content subscription site with exclusive photos and videos.
  2. Contains clear age verification and legal compliance notices.
  3. Uses multiple third-party scripts and CDNs for performance and UI.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is suspicious for a commercial site.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and has cookie consent banner.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Modernizr, and other JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and interactive user experience. It leverages CDN-hosted resources for performance and includes video streaming capabilities via MediaElement.js. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported through canonical tags and meta descriptions. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in script loading and image delivery. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not disclosed. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lanakendrick.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lanakendrick.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.