Skip to main content

Security report for lamagroup.cz

LAMA ENERGY GROUP · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LAMA ENERGY GROUP is a large, established business operating primarily in the energy sector with diversified activities including oil and gas extraction, telecommunications, geological exploration, industrial manufacturing, and trade in petroleum products. The company serves both households and businesses across multiple countries including the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Canada, USA, and Mongolia. Their business model focuses on long-term partnerships and reliable service delivery. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern scripts such as jQuery, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and multimedia content. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or privacy policies, which could be improved. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common and justified for this business type. The website shows no signs of malicious activity or suspicious content, and the business credibility is high based on content and presentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lamagroup.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position with presence in 5 countries and 25 companies, employing around 700 staff. Their revenue and asset base are stable, reflecting a mature business. Key competitive advantages include diversified energy-related services, telecommunications offerings, and industrial manufacturing capabilities. The target customers include both residential and commercial clients. The company emphasizes energy-saving solutions and custom energy sources, aligning with current market trends. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but the presence of multiple country operations suggests a broad network. Growth indicators include geographic expansion and stable management team. The website content supports a professional and trustworthy image.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies, lack of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicate gaps in security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible on the site, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing GDPR and privacy compliance.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LAMA ENERGY GROUP
Description
LAMA ENERGY GROUP is a reliable supplier of products and services for households and businesses, focusing on energy supply, oil and gas extraction, telecommunications, geological exploration, industrial production, and trade in petroleum products. The company emphasizes long-term partnerships, reliability, and energy-saving solutions.
Key services
Gas and electricity supply, Oil and gas extraction, Telecommunications services including paid TV, internet, mobile virtual operator, VoIP, Geological exploration in multiple countries, Industrial manufacturing of polycarbonate cabins, Trade and transport of petroleum products, Energy-saving solutions and custom energy sources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Audiences
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with custom theme
  6. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts are used for analytics and consent management
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No visible certifications or security frameworks mentioned
  9. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses jQuery, Cookiebot, and Google Tag Manager scripts. The site includes responsive video content and is mobile-optimized. Performance appears moderate with no obvious broken elements. SEO is supported by meta tags and alternate language links. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. There is an opportunity to improve technical security by adding security headers and enhancing privacy disclosures. The site structure and navigation are clear and user-friendly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lamagroup.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lamagroup.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.