Skip to main content

Security report for lafivents.lv

Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lafivents.lv is a Latvian website representing a small business specializing in building engineering system services including climate control, automation, energy management, and maintenance. The company claims expertise since 1996 and targets building owners and facility managers in Latvia. The website content is primarily in Latvian with an option for English, and it provides basic information about their services and partner companies. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Google Analytics, but lacks advanced CMS or frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile, but accessibility and SEO are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but no visible security headers or policies. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact emails or phone numbers are found, limiting trust and compliance indicators. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security headers, and clearer contact information to improve trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lafivents.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the energy sector focusing on building engineering solutions. Its market position is that of a local expert with a long history since 1996. The business model is service-oriented, providing engineering system maintenance, automation, and monitoring. Key services include HVAC solutions, building automation, energy monitoring, and sheet metal manufacturing for ventilation. The company collaborates with partner sites intellify.lv and ventmontaza.lv, indicating a partnership ecosystem. The website's limited digital maturity and lack of detailed business information suggest a small-sized enterprise with room for growth in online presence and compliance. No revenue or financial data is available. The target customer segment is regional, focusing on Latvian building owners and managers.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communication. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate tracking but no visible vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Incident response and security policy information are missing, which could hinder timely handling of security events. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Include clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Provides engineering system maintenance, repair, BMS monitoring, and 24-hour technical assistance focused on building climate, automation, energy management, and service.
Key services
Building climate solutions (air conditioning, ventilation, heating), Building automation and control, Energy consumption and microclimate monitoring, Sheet metal product manufacturing for ventilation, Engineering system maintenance and 24-hour technical support
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lightbox, jQuery Vegas, Custom Scrollbar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly present in the HTML content.
  4. Website uses multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Google Analytics.
  5. External links to related partner domains intellify.lv and ventmontaza.lv are present.
  6. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata detected.
  7. Meta description and keywords are present but keywords contain a placeholder.
  8. Site is primarily in Latvian language with an English language switch link.
  9. No visible security headers information available from provided data.
  10. No forms detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML and CSS, enhanced by JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Lightbox, and Vegas for UI effects. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking and analytics. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with multiple background images and scripts that may impact load times. Mobile optimization is basic with a fixed viewport width of 1300px, which may not be fully responsive on smaller devices. SEO is basic with meta description present but keywords contain a placeholder. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lafivents.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lafivents.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.