Skip to main content

Security report for ladraodepacks.com

Ladrao De Packs · Media · Portugal

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ladrão De Packs is a niche adult content website specializing in Portuguese amateur pornographic videos. Founded in 2022, it operates primarily as a content aggregation and user-submission platform targeting Portuguese-speaking adults interested in this genre. The site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The hosting infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC, and the SSL configuration is good with HTTPS enabled. The website design and content quality are basic, with moderate branding consistency and limited trust indicators. Security posture is average, with no DNSSEC, no security headers detected, and no published privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. User registration and login forms exist but lack visible security disclosures or incident response information. Advertising practices include multiple ad networks and tracking pixels, some from suspicious domains, reducing transparency. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ladraodepacks.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a Portuguese adult video platform with a focus on amateur content. Its business model relies on user-generated content submissions and advertising revenue. The partnership with ThePornDude suggests some integration or affiliation within the adult content ecosystem. The target audience is Portuguese-speaking adults seeking localized adult content. The site is relatively new, founded in 2022, and operates at a small scale. There is no evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries. The lack of clear business contact information and policies may limit growth and trust. The use of popular CMS and SEO tools indicates an intent to attract organic traffic. However, the presence of suspicious ad domains may affect reputation and monetization strategies.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers weakens DNS and HTTP security. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating poor GDPR compliance. User forms for registration and login exist but lack visible security measures or disclosures. The site uses multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts, some from suspicious domains, increasing risk exposure. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, limiting responsiveness to security events. Overall, the site requires enhancements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident management to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information on the website.
  5. Audit and remove suspicious third-party ad and tracking domains to improve transparency and reduce risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ladrao De Packs
Description
O Ladrão De Packs é um Site de vídeos Porno Portugueses
Key services
Hosting and sharing Portuguese amateur porn videos, User registration and login, Video submission by users
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
YourAdExchange, ACS CDN
Tracking pixels
Trafficstars
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content site focused on Portuguese amateur videos
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. User registration and login forms are present but no visible security disclosures
  4. Multiple external ad and tracking domains with some suspicious low-reputation domains
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  6. SEO optimized with Yoast plugin and meta tags
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  8. No DNSSEC enabled
  9. HTTPS enabled with Cloudflare DNS
  10. No security headers detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with common plugins including Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Font Awesome 4.7.0 for UI elements. Hosting leverages Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. The presence of multiple external ad and tracking scripts, some from low-reputation domains, introduces potential security and privacy risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small WordPress site but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ladraodepacks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ladraodepacks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.