Skip to main content

Security report for ladesirade-vence.fr

Ealys · Hospitality · France

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ladesirade-vence.fr represents a small hospitality business offering a vacation villa rental in Vence, France. The site provides detailed information about the villa, including accommodation capacity, amenities, and local attractions, targeting tourists and vacationers seeking a premium holiday experience on the Côte d'Azur. The business appears to be a niche local operator with a professional online presence but limited public business registration transparency. Technically, the website employs a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI libraries, delivering a visually appealing and mobile-optimized experience. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced backend platform. Performance is moderate with good SEO basics but lacks advanced analytics or tracking tools. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, and WHOIS data is not publicly available, which is common for small businesses but reduces transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic privacy policy page but no cookie banner or GDPR explicit consent. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, improved privacy compliance, and greater transparency in business and domain registration information to increase trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MongoDB

      Port 27017 (MongoDB) is publicly accessible - MongoDB - NoSQL database

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MongoDB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ladesirade-vence.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on vacation villa rentals in a premium tourist region. Its competitive advantage lies in location, villa quality, and personalized service. The business model is direct rental, likely generating revenue through seasonal bookings. The target customers are families and groups seeking upscale holiday accommodation. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized operation without extensive digital marketing or partnerships. There is no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth potential exists through enhanced online presence and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not confirmed), but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism. No signs of malware or phishing were found. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but is not uncommon. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to meet GDPR and modern security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and user data handling.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accurate and consider reducing privacy protection if business transparency is a priority.
  5. Integrate analytics and monitoring tools to better understand user behavior and detect potential security incidents.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ealys
Description
Location d'une villa de vacances à Vence, Provence - Côte d'Azur, pouvant héberger jusqu'à 10 personnes, équipée avec piscine et vue panoramique.
Key services
Villa rental, Vacation accommodation, Tourist information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, FontAwesome, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Modernizr, Vivus, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about villa rental
  2. No visible security headers or HTTPS status in provided data
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected
  4. Contact email is obfuscated but valid and related to business domain
  5. No phone numbers or social media links explicitly found
  6. No forms detected in the HTML content
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the head section
  8. Website uses modern front-end libraries and frameworks
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, providing responsive design and interactive elements such as carousels and video popups. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. No backend or hosting details were found. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing integrations, indicating limited digital marketing maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ladesirade-vence.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ladesirade-vence.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.