Skip to main content

Security report for laboratoire-gallia.com

Laboratoire Gallia · Healthcare · France

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Laboratoire Gallia is a French specialist in infant nutrition products, providing both commercial products and extensive parental support content. The website targets parents and healthcare professionals with expert advice, calculators, and a dedicated professional portal. The brand is associated with Danone, as indicated by hosting and media assets. The digital infrastructure is modern, leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS and multiple analytics and marketing tools. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that requires further verification. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security policies and some security headers. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, serving its audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain api.laboratoire-gallia.com points to unregistered service br-prod-elb-582589145.eu-west-1.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laboratoire-gallia.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector focusing on infant nutrition, with a strong market position in France. Their business model combines product sales via an e-commerce platform and informational support to parents and healthcare professionals. The presence of expert consultation services and multiple communication channels enhances customer engagement. The brand leverages social media and podcasting to extend reach. The association with Danone suggests strong corporate backing. The website content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with good SEO and user experience. The lack of WHOIS data is unusual but may be due to privacy or technical issues. No suspicious domains or affiliate programs were detected, indicating a focused and controlled digital ecosystem.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure pages were found. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were found in the content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize risk from vulnerabilities or data leakage.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Laboratoire Gallia
Description
Laboratoire Gallia, spécialiste des préparations infantiles, vous accompagne et vous conseille sur l'alimentation et le développement de bébé.
Key services
Infant nutrition products, Parental support and advice, Expert consultation services, Online shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, TagCommander, Perfmaker, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Perfmaker, TagCommander
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), TagCommander, Perfmaker
Marketing tools
TagCommander, Perfmaker
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French targeting parents and healthcare professionals.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected; no error pages.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and lowers trust score.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, WhatsApp, and contact forms.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and podcast platforms.
  7. Use of Adobe Experience Manager CMS and modern tracking/analytics tools.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, indicating a robust enterprise-grade content management system. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for analytics and marketing tags, including Google Tag Manager, TagCommander, and Perfmaker. The hosting appears to be managed or affiliated with Danone, as indicated by media asset URLs. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in image loading and script management. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laboratoire-gallia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laboratoire-gallia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.