Skip to main content

Security report for labmed.org.uk

The Association for Laboratory Medicine · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Association for Laboratory Medicine is a UK-based professional membership organization dedicated to advancing clinical science and laboratory medicine. Founded in 2022, it serves healthcare scientists, clinical biochemists, immunologists, and microbiologists by providing education, resources, events, and advocacy to promote high standards in laboratory testing and patient care. The organization maintains strong industry partnerships and sponsors, enhancing its market position as a leading body in the laboratory medicine sector. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including Preside CMS, Bootstrap, and jQuery, with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and well-structured, offering a good user experience and professional design. SEO and metadata are properly implemented, supporting discoverability. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and secure form handling. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers, which are areas for improvement. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, reflecting a good privacy posture. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference. The domain registration data aligns with the organization's profile, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching labmed.org.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Association for Laboratory Medicine operates as a professional membership organization in the healthcare sector, focusing on laboratory medicine. Its business model revolves around member services, educational content, events, and advocacy. The organization targets healthcare scientists and clinical professionals, positioning itself as a key UK player with international affiliations. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and educational offerings. The presence of prominent corporate sponsors and affiliates indicates strong industry relationships and credibility. Growth indicators include active resource publication, event hosting, and engagement with workforce planning initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes major diagnostic companies and professional bodies, enhancing its influence and reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS and secure form submissions. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces overall security maturity. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies. The organization should consider formalizing security policies and incident response procedures to improve readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Include dedicated security or abuse contact channels for incident reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
The Association for Laboratory Medicine
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Association for Laboratory Medicine
Description
One of the world's leading professional membership organisations dedicated to the practice and promotion of clinical science - promoting the highest standards in laboratory testing and patient care. Clinical biochemistry, immunology and microbiology.
Key services
Membership services, Education and training, Events and awards, Publications, Policy and media engagement, Science knowledge hub
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap, Pixl8core, Preside CMS, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Preside CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to laboratory medicine professionals.
  3. Clear navigation with multiple submenus and resources.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  7. Contact information includes physical address and phone number but no direct email found in HTML.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram.
  9. Corporate sponsors and affiliates indicate strong industry relationships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Preside CMS, Bootstrap framework, and jQuery libraries, ensuring responsive design and good accessibility. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registration is through a reputable registrar. Opportunities exist to improve technical security configurations and enhance performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with labmed.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review labmed.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.