Skip to main content

Security report for kurzemesradio.lv

Akciju Sabiedrība “KURZEMES RADIO” · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kurzemes Radio is a regional Latvian radio broadcaster with a significant weekly audience, offering music, news, and entertainment programming. The company operates a professionally designed website built on WordPress, featuring modern web technologies such as Gravity Forms, Google reCAPTCHA, and SEO optimizations. The site provides clear contact information, social media integration, and a privacy policy indicating GDPR awareness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and spam protection on forms, but lacks some HTTP security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional media business with room for security and privacy enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kurzemesradio.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kurzemesradio.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kurzemesradio.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kurzemes Radio targets Latvian listeners primarily in the Kurzeme region, positioning itself as a key regional media outlet with a medium-sized operation founded in 2018. The business model centers on radio broadcasting and advertising services, supported by online streaming and program archives. The company maintains active social media channels and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a trustworthy market presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation focused on regional media.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection, demonstrating baseline security practices. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no security certifications are visible. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a GDPR compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Security score is moderate with recommendations to implement security headers, cookie consent, and a security.txt file to improve transparency and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Akciju Sabiedrība “KURZEMES RADIO”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akciju Sabiedrība “KURZEMES RADIO”
Description
Kurzemes Radio nedēļā sasniedz 57 tūkstošus klausītāju. Savukārt Kurzemes Radio kopējā nedēļas auditorija Latvijā ir 107 tūkstoši (KANTAR TNS radio auditorijas pētījums Vasara 2023 – Rudens 2023).
Key services
Radio broadcasting, Advertising services, Online streaming, Program archives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Slider, AOS (Animate On Scroll)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for Gravity Forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia features.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  4. Privacy policy is present and detailed, but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; limits domain trust verification.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; opportunity for security hardening.
  7. No visible terms of service or incident response information.
  8. Social media presence is active and linked.
  9. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for data collection, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Google reCAPTCHA for spam prevention. It uses jQuery, Slick Slider, and AOS for interactive and animated UI elements. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and performance rated as moderate. No hosting provider details were found in the HTML content. The site uses canonical URLs and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kurzemesradio.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kurzemesradio.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.