Skip to main content

Security report for kurzemesnami.lv

SIA Kurzemes Nami · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Kurzemes Nami is a Latvian company specializing in real estate property management, offering a comprehensive range of services including property administration, project management, accounting, technical maintenance, construction, and cleaning services. The company serves residential property owners, associations, and legal entities primarily in the Saldus, Tukums, and Jelgava regions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and a privacy policy, indicating a legitimate business operation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some important security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business-focused with no signs of malicious or adult content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kurzemesnami.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted local property management service provider with over 180 residential buildings under management. Their business model revolves around offering tailored property management and related services, leveraging partnerships and EU funding for energy efficiency projects. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise focused on regional markets. The absence of extensive certifications or security policies indicates a typical SMB profile. The company maintains direct contact channels and a privacy policy, supporting compliance with GDPR. No suspicious or unrelated domains are linked, and analytics usage is limited to Google Analytics, reflecting moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and up-to-date WordPress core and plugins, which is positive for security. However, the lack of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is common for SMBs but represents an area for improvement. Forms do not show anti-CSRF tokens, potentially exposing them to CSRF attacks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to improve security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Include anti-CSRF tokens in all forms to protect against cross-site request forgery attacks.
  4. Publish a basic security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly monitor and update all WordPress components and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Kurzemes Nami
Registration number
42403045186
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Kurzemes Nami
Description
SIA «Kurzemes nami» ir uzņēmums, kurš nodarbojas ar nekustamo īpašumu pārvaldīšanu, apvienojot savā komandā pieredzes bagātus speciālistus un sadarbības partnerus. Nodrošina pakalpojumus dzīvokļu īpašniekiem, biedrībām un juridiskām personām, tostarp namu pārvaldīšanu, projektu vadību, grāmatvedības pakalpojumus, tehnisko servisu, celtniecību un remontdarbus, teritoriju uzturēšanu, ūdens skaitītāju nomaiņu un telpu uzkopšanu.
Key services
Namu pārvaldīšana, Projektu vadība, Grāmatvedības pakalpojumi, Tehniskais serviss, Celtniecība un remontdarbi, Teritoriju uzturēšana un labiekārtošana, Ūdens skaitītāju izbūve un nomaiņa, Telpu uzkopšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, RevSlider, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Fonts, MediaElement.js
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of updated libraries (WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Privacy policy is present and linked in footer.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  5. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  9. No suspicious external domains or links detected.
  10. No advertising networks besides Google Analytics detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider plugins, using jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts. The site loads a variety of CSS and JS assets, indicating a feature-rich but potentially heavier page load. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by responsive CSS and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA landmarks and language attributes present but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is supported by meta description, keywords, canonical links, and RSS feeds. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in asset loading and caching. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kurzemesnami.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kurzemesnami.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.