Skip to main content

Security report for kupele-bojnice.sk

Kúpele Bojnice, a.s. · Hospitality · Slovakia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kúpele Bojnice, a.s. is an established spa and wellness service provider based in Slovakia, offering accommodation, therapeutic procedures, and leisure activities. The company has a strong regional presence supported by a domain registered since 2003 and certifications such as EUROPESPA. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting general consumers seeking health and relaxation services. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, with mobile responsiveness and good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with moderate user tracking via Google Analytics.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kupele-bojnice.sk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector focusing on spa and wellness services. Its business model revolves around providing health treatments, accommodation, and leisure packages to a broad audience. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position supported by long domain tenure and certifications. Partnerships with EUROPESPA and local service providers enhance credibility. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and maintains clear contact information. Revenue streams likely include spa packages, accommodation bookings, and wellness services. Growth potential exists through digital marketing and enhanced online booking capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options may expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No forms were detected on the landing page, limiting attack surface. Google Analytics is used with cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be strengthened with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy or contact channel to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding structured data (JSON-LD) for business and contact information to improve SEO and trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kúpele Bojnice, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kúpele Bojnice, a.s.
Description
Kúpele Bojnice is a spa company offering accommodation, spa treatments, wellness, and leisure activities in Bojnice, Slovakia.
Key services
Spa treatments, Accommodation, Wellness procedures, Leisure activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Animate.css, ResponsiveSlides, FancyBox, TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with TermsFeed integration.
  3. Clear business contact information including phone numbers and physical address present.
  4. Use of standard and popular web technologies and libraries.
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML content, indicating limited data collection on landing page.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
  7. Google Analytics used for visitor tracking with cookie consent.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; may require server header inspection.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and secured with DNSSEC.
  10. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and several plugins like FancyBox and ResponsiveSlides for UI enhancements. The hosting is provided by websupport.sk with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a secure DNS configuration. Performance is moderate with standard image caching and script loading. The site is mobile optimized and includes a cookie consent banner powered by TermsFeed. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, but structured data is absent. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and accessibility improvements are recommended to modernize the site further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kupele-bojnice.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kupele-bojnice.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.