Skip to main content

Security report for kul.lt

Klaipėdos Universiteto Ligoninė · Healthcare · Lithuania

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Klaipėdos Universiteto Ligoninė is the largest healthcare institution in the Western Lithuania region, providing a wide range of medical services including ambulatory care, inpatient treatment, and paid medical services. The website reflects a professional healthcare provider with a strong focus on patient needs, offering detailed information about clinics, centers, and patient services. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Translate, and Swiper.js, supporting a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers, though explicit security and incident response policies are not prominently found on the site. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, though the absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable gap that should be addressed to confirm domain legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kul.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution holds a significant market position as a major healthcare provider in Lithuania, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and students. Its business model revolves around healthcare service delivery, patient registration, and offering paid medical services. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and patient engagement. The presence of testimonials and detailed contact information enhances trust. The organization appears to have a stable operational model with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries listed on the site. The use of translation services indicates an intent to serve a multilingual audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Forms include CSRF tokens, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, there is no visible dedicated security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerable libraries or security issues were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is supported by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact details.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies.
  4. Enhance visibility of data protection officer contact information if applicable.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect current regulations and practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Klaipėdos Universiteto Ligoninė
Description
Didžiausia sveikatos priežiūros įstaiga Vakarų Lietuvos regione, teikianti ambulatorines, stacionarines ir mokamas medicinos paslaugas, turinti įvairias klinikas ir centrus.
Key services
Ambulatorinės paslaugos, Mokamos paslaugos, Klinikos ir centrai, Pacientų registracija, Medicininė reabilitacija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Translate widget, Swiper.js (carousel), jQuery UI Datepicker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Translate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further domain verification
  3. Strong focus on healthcare services with detailed patient information
  4. Good use of accessibility and translation tools
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented
  7. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found in the main HTML but likely exist on subpages
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries and widgets such as Swiper.js for carousels and Google Translate for multilingual support. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating a structured approach to data collection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, including ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears to be custom or proprietary. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kul.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kul.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.